BACKGROUND: It is not yet established what specific measures of obesity might be most strongly associated with risk of coronary artery disease. We compared the waist-height ratio to waist-hip ratio, waist circumference, and body mass index as predictors of subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) in a group of predominantly postmenopausal women. METHODS: The data come from the prospective Nurses' Health Study cohort. We included 45,563 women in 1986 who were aged 40-65 years and were free of heart disease, stroke, and cancer. Waist circumference, hip circumference, height, weight, age, and other covariates were collected by questionnaire. Our primary end point was incident coronary heart disease reported up to June 2002. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were estimated nonparametrically for each of the anthropometric measures. We estimated differences between the AUCs for weight-height ratio and the other measures, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the relationships with risk of CHD. RESULTS: Waist-height ratio, waist-hip ratio, and waist circumference were similar in predicting subsequent risk of CHD. All 3 waist-derived measures were superior to body-mass index (BMI) in predicting CHD. The unadjusted AUCs were 0.62 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.64) for waist-height ratio, 0.63 (0.61-0.65) for waist-hip ratio, 0.62 (0.60-0.64) for waist-circumference, and 0.57 (0.55-0.59) for BMI. CONCLUSION: Waist-height ratio is comparable with waist circumference and waist-hip ratio for prediction of coronary heart disease incidence among middle-aged and older women, but superior to BMI.
BACKGROUND: It is not yet established what specific measures of obesity might be most strongly associated with risk of coronary artery disease. We compared the waist-height ratio to waist-hip ratio, waist circumference, and body mass index as predictors of subsequent coronary heart disease (CHD) in a group of predominantly postmenopausal women. METHODS: The data come from the prospective Nurses' Health Study cohort. We included 45,563 women in 1986 who were aged 40-65 years and were free of heart disease, stroke, and cancer. Waist circumference, hip circumference, height, weight, age, and other covariates were collected by questionnaire. Our primary end point was incident coronary heart disease reported up to June 2002. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were estimated nonparametrically for each of the anthropometric measures. We estimated differences between the AUCs for weight-height ratio and the other measures, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the relationships with risk of CHD. RESULTS: Waist-height ratio, waist-hip ratio, and waist circumference were similar in predicting subsequent risk of CHD. All 3 waist-derived measures were superior to body-mass index (BMI) in predicting CHD. The unadjusted AUCs were 0.62 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.64) for waist-height ratio, 0.63 (0.61-0.65) for waist-hip ratio, 0.62 (0.60-0.64) for waist-circumference, and 0.57 (0.55-0.59) for BMI. CONCLUSION: Waist-height ratio is comparable with waist circumference and waist-hip ratio for prediction of coronary heart disease incidence among middle-aged and older women, but superior to BMI.
Authors: M J Stampfer; W C Willett; F E Speizer; D C Dysert; R Lipnick; B Rosner; C H Hennekens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1984-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: W Willett; M J Stampfer; C Bain; R Lipnick; F E Speizer; B Rosner; D Cramer; C H Hennekens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1983-06 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ilan Gabriely; Xiao Hui Ma; Xiao Man Yang; Gil Atzmon; Michael W Rajala; Anders H Berg; Phillip Scherer; Luciano Rossetti; Nir Barzilai Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Rachel S Casas; Kelley K Pettee Gabriel; Andrea M Kriska; Lewis H Kuller; Molly B Conroy Journal: Menopause Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: David J Tybor; Alice H Lichtenstein; Gerard E Dallal; Stephen R Daniels; Aviva Must Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-12-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Abishek Stanley; John Schuna; Shengping Yang; Samantha Kennedy; Moonseong Heo; Michael Wong; John Shepherd; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Maryam Shakiba; Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Arsalan Salari; Hamid Soori; Nasrin Mansournia; Jay S Kaufman Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Vanessa Zen; Flávio D Fuchs; Marco V Wainstein; Sandro C Gonçalves; Karina Biavatti; Charles E Riedner; Felipe C Fuchs; Rodrigo V Wainstein; Ernani L Rhoden; Jorge P Ribeiro; Sandra C Fuchs Journal: Am J Cardiovasc Dis Date: 2012-10-25
Authors: Daniel P Beavers; Kristen M Beavers; Mary F Lyles; Barbara J Nicklas Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 6.053