PURPOSE: Despite treatments which lower circulating androgens, advanced prostate cancers often maintain androgen receptor (AR) signaling. The variable response to secondary hormonal manipulations in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) creates a compelling need for strategies to individualize therapy based on the molecular features of each patient's tumor. METHODS: A transcription-based AR activity signature was developed from an androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell (LNCaP) and tested on independent data sets of prostate cancer cell lines and human tumors to assess its precision and accuracy in detecting AR activity. The AR signature was applied to multiple sets of prostate specimens to determine how AR activity changes with hormone therapy and progression and oncogenic pathway analysis was used to identify biologic pathways correlating with AR activity. RESULTS: A robust AR signature accurately predicts AR activity in multiple prostate cancer cell lines, has minimal variation between replicate samples, and accurately reflects an individual's hormone status and intraprostatic dihydrotestosterone levels. The AR signature finds AR activity to be high in local, untreated prostate tumors and decreased in prostate tissue after neoadjuvant hormone therapy and in CRPC. Heterogeneity of AR activity exists along the spectrum of prostate cancer progression and decreasing predicted AR activity correlates with increasing predicted Src activity and sensitivity to dasatinib (Src-targeting kinase inhibitor). CONCLUSION: A transcription-based AR signature can detect AR activity within individual prostate cancer specimens and has the potential to help individualize and improve care for patients with CRPC.
PURPOSE: Despite treatments which lower circulating androgens, advanced prostate cancers often maintain androgen receptor (AR) signaling. The variable response to secondary hormonal manipulations in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) creates a compelling need for strategies to individualize therapy based on the molecular features of each patient's tumor. METHODS: A transcription-based AR activity signature was developed from an androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cell (LNCaP) and tested on independent data sets of prostate cancer cell lines and humantumors to assess its precision and accuracy in detecting AR activity. The AR signature was applied to multiple sets of prostate specimens to determine how AR activity changes with hormone therapy and progression and oncogenic pathway analysis was used to identify biologic pathways correlating with AR activity. RESULTS: A robust AR signature accurately predicts AR activity in multiple prostate cancer cell lines, has minimal variation between replicate samples, and accurately reflects an individual's hormone status and intraprostatic dihydrotestosterone levels. The AR signature finds AR activity to be high in local, untreated prostate tumors and decreased in prostate tissue after neoadjuvant hormone therapy and in CRPC. Heterogeneity of AR activity exists along the spectrum of prostate cancer progression and decreasing predicted AR activity correlates with increasing predicted Src activity and sensitivity to dasatinib (Src-targeting kinase inhibitor). CONCLUSION: A transcription-based AR signature can detect AR activity within individual prostate cancer specimens and has the potential to help individualize and improve care for patients with CRPC.
Authors: Changmeng Cai; Housheng Hansen He; Sen Chen; Ilsa Coleman; Hongyun Wang; Zi Fang; Shaoyong Chen; Peter S Nelson; X Shirley Liu; Myles Brown; Steven P Balk Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Przemyslaw W Twardowski; Jan H Beumer; C S Chen; Andrew S Kraft; Gurkamal S Chatta; Masato Mitsuhashi; Wei Ye; Susan M Christner; Michael B Lilly Journal: Anticancer Drugs Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 2.248
Authors: Evan Y Yu; Fenghai Duan; Mark Muzi; Xuan Deng; Bennett B Chin; Joshi J Alumkal; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Jina M Taub; Ben Herman; Celestia S Higano; Robert K Doot; Donna Hartfeil; Philip G Febbo; David A Mankoff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Atish D Choudhury; Anna C Schinzel; Maura B Cotter; Rosina T Lis; Katherine Labella; Ying Jie Lock; Francesca Izzo; Isil Guney; Michaela Bowden; Yvonne Y Li; Jinal Patel; Emily Hartman; Steven A Carr; Monica Schenone; Jacob D Jaffe; Philip W Kantoff; Peter S Hammerman; William C Hahn Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: John C Araujo; Géralyn C Trudel; Fred Saad; Andrew J Armstrong; Evan Y Yu; Joaquim Bellmunt; George Wilding; John McCaffrey; Sergio V Serrano; Vsevolod B Matveev; Eleni Efstathiou; Stephane Oudard; Michael J Morris; Bruce Sizer; Peter J Goebell; Axel Heidenreich; Johann S de Bono; Stephen Begbie; Jun H Hong; Eduardo Richardet; Enrique Gallardo; Prashni Paliwal; Susan Durham; Shinta Cheng; Christopher J Logothetis Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Eric G Bluemn; Elysia Sophie Spencer; Brigham Mecham; Ryan R Gordon; Ilsa Coleman; Daniel Lewinshtein; Elahe Mostaghel; Xiaotun Zhang; James Annis; Carla Grandori; Christopher Porter; Peter S Nelson Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 5.852