Literature DB >> 19288884

Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.

Arthur B Novaes1, Raquel R M Barros, Valdir A Muglia, Germana J Borges.   

Abstract

Among the factors that contribute to the papilla formation and crestal bone preservation between contiguous implants, this animal study clinically and radiographically evaluated the interimplant distances (IDs) of 2 and 3 mm and the placement depths of Morse cone connection implants restored with platform switch. Bilateral mandibular premolars of 6 dogs were extracted, and after 12 weeks, the implants were placed. Four experimental groups were constituted: subcrestally with ID of 2 mm (2 SCL) and 3 mm (3 SCL) and crestally with ID of 2 mm (2 CL) and 3 mm (3 CL). Metallic crowns were immediately installed with a distance of 3 mm between the contact point and the bone crest. Eight weeks later, clinical measurements were performed to evaluate papilla formation, and radiographic images were taken to analyze the crestal bone remodeling. The subcrestal groups achieved better levels of papillae formation when compared with the crestal groups, with a significant difference between the 3 SCL and 3 CL groups (P = .026). Radiographically, the crestal bone preservation was also better in the subcrestal groups, with statistically significant differences between the 2SCL and 2CL groups (P = .002) and between the 3SCL and 3CL groups (P = .008). With the present conditions, it could be concluded that subcrestal implant placement had a positive impact on papilla formation and crestal bone preservation, which could favor the esthetic of anterior regions. However, the IDs of 2 and 3 mm did not show significantly different results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19288884     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336-35.1.18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  10 in total

Review 1.  Influence of subcrestal implant placement compared with equicrestal position on the peri-implant hard and soft tissues around platform-switched implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Valles; Xavier Rodríguez-Ciurana; Marco Clementini; Mariana Baglivo; Blanca Paniagua; Jose Nart
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcelo Coelho Goiato; Eduardo Piza Pellizzer; Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva; Liliane da Rocha Bonatto; Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-25

3.  Retrospective Clinical Study of Marginal Bone Level Changes with Two Different Screw-Implant Types: Comparison Between Tissue Level (TE) and Bone Level (BL) Implant.

Authors:  Vinay V Kumar; Keyvan Sagheb; Peer W Kämmerer; Bilal Al-Nawas; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-06-11

4.  Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implants Placed at Equicrestal and Subcrestal Levels Before Loading: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  Balaji Nagarajan; Varsha Murthy; David Livingstone; Manohar Paul Surendra; Srinivasan Jayaraman
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 5.  Morse taper dental implants and platform switching: The new paradigm in oral implantology.

Authors:  José Paulo Macedo; Jorge Pereira; Brendan R Vahey; Bruno Henriques; Cesar A M Benfatti; Ricardo S Magini; José López-López; Júlio C M Souza
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

6.  Influence of Bone-Level Dental Implants Placement and of Cortical Thickness on Osseointegration: In Silico and In Vivo Analyses.

Authors:  Javier Gil; Clara Sandino; Miguel Cerrolaza; Román Pérez; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Blanca Rios-Carrasco; Jose Vicente Rios-Santos; Aritza Brizuela
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A meta analysis for evaluation of marginal bone level changes at dental implants.

Authors:  Varun Kumar; Geeta Arya; Pranshu Singh; Pallavi Chauhan
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-16

8.  Current results and trends in platform switching.

Authors:  Hadi Salimi; Omid Savabi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12

Review 9.  Impact of implant-abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Andrea Hegewald; Jürgen Becker
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 5.977

10.  Peri-implant bone preservation of a novel, self-cutting, and fully tapered implant in the healed crestal ridge of minipigs: submerged vs. transgingival healing.

Authors:  Helena Francisco; Gary Finelle; Fabien Bornert; Rebecca Sandgren; Valentin Herber; Nils Warfving; Benjamin E Pippenger
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.