Literature DB >> 1928879

A randomized, controlled comparison of isoetharine and albuterol in the treatment of acute asthma.

C L Emerman1, R K Cydulka, D Effron, T W Lukens, H Gershman, S P Boehm.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether treatment of acute asthma with repeated doses of nebulized albuterol leads to greater bronchodilation and lower hospital admission rate than treatment with nebulized isoetharine.
DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial of albuterol and isoetharine. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Patients between 18 and 50 years old presenting with acute asthma. Patients were excluded if they had a history of sensitivity to the study drugs, had congestive heart failure or chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease, or were unable to perform spirometry. One hundred three patients were entered into the study.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients received oxygen and methylprednisolone in addition to administration of either isoetharine or albuterol. The nebulized aerosol was given at hourly intervals for a total of three doses.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Spirometry was performed before treatment and again at 90 and 180 minutes. Initial forced expiratory volume at one minute (FEV1) was 38.1% of predicted normal for the albuterol group and 36.0% of predicted normal for the isoetharine group. At 180 minutes, FEV1 was 55.6% of predicted normal for the albuterol group and 57.1% of predicted for the isoetharine group (NS). Twenty-eight percent of the albuterol group required admission compared with 26% of the isoetharine group (NS). There was no difference in occurrence of side effects between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Repeated doses of albuterol do not lead to a greater improvement in pulmonary function or a lower hospital admission rate than treatment with isoetharine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1928879     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81381-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  2 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of treatments for respiratory disease.

Authors:  S Bryan; M J Buxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Salmeterol. An appraisal of its quality-of-life benefits and potential pharmacoeconomic positioning in asthma.

Authors:  D H Peters; D Faulds
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.