BACKGROUND: : Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment option for delivering regional chemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma confined to a limb. Recurrent or progressive disease after an ILI, however, presents a challenge for further treatment. The value of repeat ILI in this situation has not been well documented. METHODS: : Forty-eight patients were identified who had been treated with a repeat ILI. In all patients, a cytotoxic combination of melphalan and actinomycin D was used. RESULTS: : The median time between the 2 procedures was 11 months. The complete response (CR) rate after repeat ILI was 23%, compared with 31% after the initial ILI (P = .36). The overall response was 83%, compared with 75% after the first procedure (P = .32). The median duration of response was 11 months (10 months for patients with CR; P = .80), and median survival was 38 months. In those patients achieving a CR, the median survival was 68 months (P = .003). Toxicity after repeat ILI was increased, with 20 patients experiencing Wieberdink grade III limb toxicity (considerable erythema and edema with blistering) and 5 patients experiencing grade IV toxicity (threatened or actual compartment syndrome), whereas after the initial ILI these toxicity grades occurred in 14 patients and 1 patient, respectively (P = .03). No patient experienced grade V toxicity (requiring amputation). CONCLUSIONS: : Repeat ILI is an attractive treatment option to achieve limb salvage in patients with inoperable recurrent or progressive melanoma after a previous ILI. It can be associated with significant short-term regional toxicity, but is well tolerated by most patients, with satisfactory response rates. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: : Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is an effective and minimally invasive treatment option for delivering regional chemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma confined to a limb. Recurrent or progressive disease after an ILI, however, presents a challenge for further treatment. The value of repeat ILI in this situation has not been well documented. METHODS: : Forty-eight patients were identified who had been treated with a repeat ILI. In all patients, a cytotoxic combination of melphalan and actinomycin D was used. RESULTS: : The median time between the 2 procedures was 11 months. The complete response (CR) rate after repeat ILI was 23%, compared with 31% after the initial ILI (P = .36). The overall response was 83%, compared with 75% after the first procedure (P = .32). The median duration of response was 11 months (10 months for patients with CR; P = .80), and median survival was 38 months. In those patients achieving a CR, the median survival was 68 months (P = .003). Toxicity after repeat ILI was increased, with 20 patients experiencing Wieberdink grade III limb toxicity (considerable erythema and edema with blistering) and 5 patients experiencing grade IV toxicity (threatened or actual compartment syndrome), whereas after the initial ILI these toxicity grades occurred in 14 patients and 1 patient, respectively (P = .03). No patient experienced grade V toxicity (requiring amputation). CONCLUSIONS: : Repeat ILI is an attractive treatment option to achieve limb salvage in patients with inoperable recurrent or progressive melanoma after a previous ILI. It can be associated with significant short-term regional toxicity, but is well tolerated by most patients, with satisfactory response rates. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Christy Y Chai; Jeremiah L Deneve; Georgia M Beasley; Suroosh S Marzban; Y Ann Chen; Bhupendra Rawal; Stephen R Grobmyer; Steven N Hochwald; Douglas S Tyler; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Amanda K Raymond; Georgia M Beasley; Gloria Broadwater; Christina K Augustine; James C Padussis; Ryan Turley; Bercedis Peterson; Hilliard Seigler; Scott K Pruitt; Douglas S Tyler Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Georgia M Beasley; Paul Speicher; Christina K Augustine; Paul C Dolber; Bercedis L Peterson; Ketan Sharma; Paul J Mosca; Richard Royal; Merrick Ross; Jonathan S Zager; Douglas S Tyler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kristen E Olberding; Xiaoli Wang; Yanglong Zhu; Jianmin Pan; Shesh N Rai; Chi Li Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Michael J Carr; James Sun; Hidde M Kroon; John T Miura; Georgia M Beasley; Norma E Farrow; Paul J Mosca; Michael C Lowe; Clara R Farley; Youngchul Kim; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Dennis A Kirichenko; Aishwarya Potdar; Hala Daou; Dean Mullen; Jeffrey M Farma; Michael A Henderson; David Speakman; Jonathan Serpell; Keith A Delman; B Mark Smithers; Brendon J Coventry; Douglas S Tyler; John F Thompson; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-09-11 Impact factor: 5.344