BACKGROUND: According to the presenting electrocardiogram, acute myocardial infarction (MI) can by categorised generally as non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). AIM: To assess the impact of the different acute MI categories on in-hospital management and mortality in hospitals without on-site invasive facilities. METHODS: We identified 380 NSTEMI and 334 STEMI patients treated in the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes from February to March 2005 and from December 2005 to January 2006. Data concerning in-hospital management and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with NSTEMI were older and were more likely to have prior angina, prior MI and prior heart failure symptoms than STEMI patients. The NSTEMI patients were less likely to be transferred for invasive treatment (23.9 vs. 41.9%, p <0.0001) and receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during index hospital stay. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II antagonists, nitrates and statins was more frequent in NSTEMI patients. Among patients treated non-invasively, in-hospital mortality was high, but was lower in NSTEMI than STEMI patients (12.1 vs. 22.7%, p <0.0001). Independent predictors of in-hospital death in this group were age, cardiogenic shock, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and STEMI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite current recommendations, NSTEMI patients are still less likely to be transferred for invasive treatment than STEMI patients. Among patients treated non-invasively during index hospital stay, NSTEMI is associated with more favourable prognosis than STEMI, but the risk of in-hospital death is high. The hospital network should implement more frequently the strategy of early and urgent invasive treatment of NSTEMI patients.
BACKGROUND: According to the presenting electrocardiogram, acute myocardial infarction (MI) can by categorised generally as non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) and ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI). AIM: To assess the impact of the different acute MI categories on in-hospital management and mortality in hospitals without on-site invasive facilities. METHODS: We identified 380 NSTEMI and 334 STEMI patients treated in the Malopolska Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes from February to March 2005 and from December 2005 to January 2006. Data concerning in-hospital management and mortality were assessed. RESULTS:Patients with NSTEMI were older and were more likely to have prior angina, prior MI and prior heart failure symptoms than STEMI patients. The NSTEMI patients were less likely to be transferred for invasive treatment (23.9 vs. 41.9%, p <0.0001) and receive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during index hospital stay. The use of low-molecular-weight heparin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II antagonists, nitrates and statins was more frequent in NSTEMI patients. Among patients treated non-invasively, in-hospital mortality was high, but was lower in NSTEMI than STEMI patients (12.1 vs. 22.7%, p <0.0001). Independent predictors of in-hospital death in this group were age, cardiogenic shock, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and STEMI. CONCLUSIONS: Despite current recommendations, NSTEMI patients are still less likely to be transferred for invasive treatment than STEMI patients. Among patients treated non-invasively during index hospital stay, NSTEMI is associated with more favourable prognosis than STEMI, but the risk of in-hospital death is high. The hospital network should implement more frequently the strategy of early and urgent invasive treatment of NSTEMI patients.
Authors: Gerald J Kost; Laurie E Kost; Audhaiwan Suwanyangyuen; Simrin K Cheema; Corbin Curtis; Stephanie Sumner; Jimmy Yu; Richard Louie Journal: Point Care Date: 2010-06
Authors: Katarzyna Styczkiewicz; Marek Styczkiewicz; Monika Myćka; Sabina Mędrek; Tomasz Kondraciuk; Anna Czerkies-Bieleń; Andrzej Wiśniewski; Sebastian Szmit; Piotr Jankowski Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Edyta Radomska; Marcin Sadowski; Jacek Kurzawski; Marek Gierlotka; Lech Polonski Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rafał Januszek; Artur Dziewierz; Zbigniew Siudak; Tomasz Rakowski; Dariusz Dudek; Stanisław Bartuś Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.240