Very long chain fatty acids are important components of plant lipids, suberins, and cuticular waxes. Trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase (ECR) catalyses the fourth reaction of fatty acid elongation, which is NADPH dependent. In the present study, the expression of two cotton ECR (GhECR) genes revealed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis was up-regulated during cotton fibre elongation. GhECR1 and 2 each contain open reading frames of 933 bp in length, both encoding proteins consisting of 310 amino acid residues. GhECRs show 32% identity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tsc13p at the deduced amino acid level, and the GhECR genes were able to restore the viability of the S. cerevisiae haploid tsc13-deletion strain. A putative non-classical NADPH-binding site in GhECR was predicted by an empirical approach. Site-directed mutagenesis in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis suggests that G(5X)IPXG presents a putative novel NADPH-binding motif of the plant ECR family. The data suggest that both GhECR genes encode functional enzymes harbouring non-classical NADPH-binding sites at their C-termini, and are involved in fatty acid elongation during cotton fibre development.
Very long chain fatty acids are important components of plant lipids, suberins, and cuticular waxes. Trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase (ECR) catalyses the fourth reaction of fatty acid elongation, which is NADPH dependent. In the present study, the expression of two cotton ECR (GhECR) genes revealed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis was up-regulated during cotton fibre elongation. GhECR1 and 2 each contain open reading frames of 933 bp in length, both encoding proteins consisting of 310 amino acid residues. GhECRs show 32% identity to Saccharomyces cerevisiaeTsc13p at the deduced amino acid level, and the GhECR genes were able to restore the viability of the S. cerevisiae haploid tsc13-deletion strain. A putative non-classical NADPH-binding site in GhECR was predicted by an empirical approach. Site-directed mutagenesis in combination with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis suggests that G(5X)IPXG presents a putative novel NADPH-binding motif of the plant ECR family. The data suggest that both GhECR genes encode functional enzymes harbouring non-classical NADPH-binding sites at their C-termini, and are involved in fatty acid elongation during cotton fibre development.
In higher plant cells, de novo fatty acid synthesis occurs in plastids, whereas fatty acid elongation, as in mammalian cells, occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Cinti ; Ohlrogge and Browse, 1995; Poulos, 1995). Plant very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs, fatty acids >C18), either saturated or monounsaturated, are important precursors of sphingolipids, seed triacylglycerols, suberins, and cuticular waxes (Kunst and Samuels, 2003; Chen ). Plant free fatty acids or their derivatives may also serve directly as signalling molecules (Kachroo ; Qin ). Fatty acid elongation uses malonyl-CoA as the two-carbondonor and proceeds via four successive reactions: a condensation of malonyl-CoA with a long chain acyl substrate producing a 3-ketoacyl-CoA catalysed by 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KCS); a reduction of 3-ketoacyl-CoA to 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA catalysed by 3-ketoacyl-CoA reductase (KCR); a dehydration of 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA to trans-2-enoyl-CoA catalysed by 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydratase (HCD); and a second reduction of trans-2-enoyl-CoA to acyl-CoA catalysed by trans-2-enoyl-CoA reductase (ECR) (Cinti ; Poulos, 1995). Following the successful identification of a yeastHCD gene, PHS1 (Denic and Weissman, 2007), a complete set of Arabidopsis genes encoding the enzymes catalysing each distinct step is now available (Lassner ; Todd ; Beaudoin ; Han ; Zheng ; Bach ; Joubès ).The first gene encoding a microsomal ECR was initially identified as TSC13 in the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae by a genetic screening method (Beeler ). Disruption of ScTSC13 (tsc13Δ) resulted in an accumulation of ceramides that harbour fatty acids shorter than 26 carbons (Kohlwein ). ScTsc13p has a six membrane-spanning topology (Paul ), and is targeted to nuclear–vacuolar junctions (Kvam ). Orthologues of ScTsc13p were subsequently identified in mouse, humans, and Arabidopsis thaliana (Moon and Horton, 2003; Gable ). Disruption of the ArabidopsisECR gene affects shoot growth and morphogenesis (Zheng ). In cotton, KCS and KCR genes were functionally characterized and VLCFAs were found to promote fibre cell elongation by activating ethylene synthesis (Qin , 2007a, b). The plant ECRs share no sequence similarities with 2-enoyl thioester reductases involved in other eukaryotic fatty acid-metabolizing processes, including cytosolic, peroxisomal, and mitochondrial, as well as prokaryotic fatty acid synthesis pathways (Smith, 1994; Airenne ; Gloerich ; Zhang ). The reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) operates chiefly with enzymes that synthesize energy-rich molecules. All the ECR enzymes characterized this far catalyse an NADPH-dependent reaction that reduces the double bond of trans-2-enoyl thioester to acyl-thioester. Although NAD(P)H was shown to be utilized in the two reductive steps of fatty acid synthesis and elongation (Harlan and Wakil, 1963; Beaudoin ; Qin ), the amino acid sequences of GhECRs lacked either the canonical Rossman fold signature GXGXXG/A (Rao and Rossmann, 1973) or other well-characterized NADP/NAD-binding motifs in the PROSITE database, such as the glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase active site or D-isomer-specific 2-hydroxyacid dehydrogenases NAD-binding signatures (Sigrist ).In this study, two putative cotton GhECR genes were identified in developing cotton fibre cells. Complementation of the growth-deficient yeasttsc13Δ mutant by the cotton gene was performed to examine the in vivo function of GhECR. A further investigation into the complex structures of nucleotide-binding protein in the Protein Data Bank (Berman ) revealed a weak similarity of the region 225-GSGGYQIPH/RG-234 of GhECRs to several nucleotide-binding motifs. The newly proposed NAD(P)H-binding motif was tested by point mutational analyses.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Xuzhou 142) and fuzzless-lintless mutant (fl) cotton ovules were planted in a fully automated greenhouse. Since the fl mutant has no fibre cells growing on the ovules, it is often used as a control for identification of genes expressed preferentially in fibre (Ji ). Fresh cotton ovules at various day(s) post-anthesis (dpa), leaves, flowers, stems, and roots were harvested immediately at the indicated times and frozen in liquid nitrogen before performing the RNA preparation.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
The cotton fibres were stripped from ovules growing at 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 dpa. Total RNA was extracted from wild-type cotton ovules, fibres, flowers, leaves, stems, roots, and fl ovules (Ji ; Shi ). Leaves of 10 d to 16 d old which developed on the apical dome were used as young leaves. Cotton cDNA was reverse-transcribed from 5 μg of total RNA with the gene-specific primers: GhECR1, 5′-TGGGAGCGGAGGCTATCAAA-3′ (forward, F) and 5′-GTCCATCGAGTAGGAAGTTTTACCC-3′ (reverse, R); GhECR2, 5′-GGTTCGGGTTTGGTATAGTTTG-3′ (F) and 5′-AAGTACGATGCTCATCGATCC-3′ (R). qRT-PCR was performed with the SYBR green PCR kit (Applied Biosystems) in a DNA Engine Opticon-Continuous Fluorescence Detection System (MJ Research) in triplicate using independent RNA samples. The cotton ubiquitin gene UBQ7 was used as internal control in each reaction.For detection of the transcripts of GhECR2 or ScTSC13 in the yeast cells, RT-PCR was performed using the following primers: GhECR2, 5′-TTGAGCTTAATGACTCGGCTACTG-3′ (F) and 5′-CGCTTTTCTTCGTATCCAAAGTAC-3′ (R); ScTSC13, 5′-CACAATATCAGCAAGTACAGGA-3′ (F) and 5′-CCGAATGAAATGAGACCG-3′ (R).
Yeast strains and media
The S. cerevisiae diploid strain W1536 TSC13/tsc13Δ (MAT a/α; ade2Δ/ade2Δ; ade3Δ/ade3Δ; can1-100/can1-100; his3-11,15/his3-11,15; leu2-3, 112/leu2-3, 112; trp1-1/trp1-1; ura3-1/ura3-1; tsc13Δ::kanMX4/TSC13) was made by transformation of a PCR-amplified tsc13Δ::kanMX4 fragment from genomic DNA of S. cerevisiae BY4743TSC13/tsc13Δ (MAT a/α; his3Δ1/his3Δ1; leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0; met15Δ0/met15Δ0; ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0; tsc13Δ::kanMX4/TSC13, EUROSCARF) containing the TSC13-flanking region. Yeast media were prepared and cells were grown according to standard procedures (Sherman ).
Construction of plasmids
The open reading frames of GhECR1 and 2 were amplified using the primers listed in Table S1 available at JXB online, restricted with BamHI–EcoRI and BamHI–XhoI, respectively, purified with the Qiagen PCR purification kit, and ligated into the TRP1-marked pYADE4 behind the ADH1 promoter, resulting in the generation of plasmids pYADE4-GhECR1 and pYADE4-GhECR2. The plasmid pYADE4-GhECR2 served as a template in PCRs for constructing all of the mutant variants with GhECR2-specific primers (Supplementary Table S1), using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The nucleotide sequences of wild-type GhECR genes and all mutants of GhECR2 were confirmed by DNA sequencing. As a control, cDNA of ScTSC13 was amplified and cloned into URA3-marked YCplac33 behind the GAL1 promoter.
Heterologous expression of cotton GhECRs in yeast cells
The plasmid pYADE4-GhECR was transformed into the W1536 TSC13/tsc13Δ yeast strain. The transformants were selected on synthetic complete medium lacking tryptophan (Sc-Trp) plates and sporulated. The growing ascospores were digested with zymolase (Seikagaku) and the tetrads were dissected using a Singer MSM manual dissection microscope (Singer Instruments). The mutant spores complemented by GhECR were replica plated on a YPD-G418 (YPD supplemented with 300 μg of geneticin ml−1) plate and a 2-amino-5-fluorobenzoic acid (FAA) plate [synthetic complete medium containing 2% (w/v) D-glucose and 0.05% (w/v) FAA] simultaneously. Spores carrying the tsc13Δ::kanMX4 knock-out allele and complemented by the pYADE4-GhECR plasmid were identified by their resistance to G418 (geneticin), and their inability to grow on FAA plates. To verify that the GhECR gene was essential for the survival of the tsc13Δ mutant, the mutant cells carrying pYADE4-GhECR were transformed by pYES2-GhECR that was constructed using the primers listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. The plasmid, pYES2-GhECR, had a URA3 marker fused with a gene fragment encoding a His-tag behind the C-terminus of GhECR. Cell viability on the FAA plate was restored.
Preparation of ER extracts from yeast cells
Yeast cells transformed by the pYADE4-GhECR plasmid were grown to exponential phase in Sc-Trp medium at 30 °C. The cells were harvested, disrupted with glass beads, and centrifuged for 15 min at 15 000 g, at 4 °C. The total lysate was centrifuged for 90 min at 85 000 g in a Sorval Ti70 rotor at 4 °C, generating the supernatant (S85) and the pellet (P85), which is an ER fraction. The protein concentration was determined by the Lowry method using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
Fatty acid extractions and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis
Wild-type haploid S. cerevisiaeW1536B cells or tsc13Δ mutant cells were transformed by pYADE4-GhECR and its variants. Yeast cells were homogenized by bead beating; subsequently fatty acids were extracted and converted to methyl esters (FAMEs) according to the method described by Cahoon and Lynch (1991). The resultant FAMEs were separated on a DB-225MS column from the Agilent 6890N GC system coupled to an HP5973 mass detector. The National Institute of Standards and Technology and Wiley databases were applied for compound identification. C17 fatty acid (heptadecanoic acid, Sigma-Aldrich) was added as an internal standard before extraction for monitoring sample recovery and quantification.
Immunoblotting
Immunoblotting was performed as described previously (Qin ), using ECL™ western blotting detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences). Recombinant GhECR was detected by using mouse monoclonal antibody against His-tag as the primary antibody (Invitrogen) and affinity-purified goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as the secondary antibody. The S. cerevisiae ER marker protein Kar2p (a gift from Dr M Rose) was used as the primary antibody, and goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as the secondary antibody.
Binding motif search
A non-redundant set of nucleotide-binding protein structures was prepared from the Protein Data Bank. All of the structures binding NADP/NAD or similar nucleotides were extracted from the database, and the proteins showing >25% sequence identity were clustered (Saito ). The final set contained 62 non-redundant proteins. The GhECR sequences were compared with these sequences to detect similarities with the nucleotide-binding sites. Conservation of the detected motifs was confirmed by using the Conserved Domain Database (CDD) at NCBI (Marchler-Bauer ). Also, the motifs were compared with the PROSITE database to detect a possible similarity to the characterized motifs (Sigrist ).
Results
The GhECR2 gene is highly expressed during cotton fibre development
Relative transcript levels of GhECRs from 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 dpa wild-type cotton fibres were quantified by qRT-PCR analysis. The transcript level of GhECR1 increased close to 3-fold and that of GhECR2 increased ∼9-fold in 10 dpa fibres compared with their levels in 0 dpa ovules (Fig. 1A). GhECR2 was predominantly expressed in the fibres and young leaves compared with the ovules, whereas expression was low in roots, stems, mature leaves, and flowers, and fl mutant ovules (Fig. 1B), indicating that GhECR2, but not GhECR1, was associated with fibre development.
Fig. 1.
Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of transcript levels of GhECR genes in wild-type cotton ovules, fibres, variable cotton tissues, and mutant cotton ovules. –3, 0, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 dpa, and 10fl indicate that total RNA samples prepared from wild-type or fl mutant cotton ovules (O) or fibres (F) were used as template for qRT-PCR analysis. Solid bars with scales to their left indicate the fold increase relative to the values of 0 dpa (A) or 10 dpa wild-type ovules (B) (arbitrarily set to 1) of the same GhECR gene. Open bars with scales to their right indicate the fold increase of each GhECR relative to cotton UBQ7 (GenBank accession no. AY189972). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA software combined with Tukey's test throughout this figure. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Quantitative real-time PCR analyses of transcript levels of GhECR genes in wild-type cotton ovules, fibres, variable cotton tissues, and mutant cotton ovules. –3, 0, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 dpa, and 10fl indicate that total RNA samples prepared from wild-type or fl mutant cotton ovules (O) or fibres (F) were used as template for qRT-PCR analysis. Solid bars with scales to their left indicate the fold increase relative to the values of 0 dpa (A) or 10 dpa wild-type ovules (B) (arbitrarily set to 1) of the same GhECR gene. Open bars with scales to their right indicate the fold increase of each GhECR relative to cotton UBQ7 (GenBank accession no. AY189972). Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA software combined with Tukey's test throughout this figure. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Cloning and prediction of the NADPH-binding site for GhECRs
Nucleotide sequence analyses indicated that both GhECR1 and GhECR2 possess 933 bp open reading frames encoding polypeptides of 310 amino acids with 89% sequence identity. GhECR1 and 2 share 81–83% sequence identity with AtECR, 82–83% with NbECR, 36–37% with human or rat ECRs, and 27–28% with S. cerevisiaeTsc13p.In order to predict NADP/NAD-binding sites in GhECRs, the sequences were compared with known nucleotide-binding motifs in the structure database (Saito ). As a result, no protein showed strong similarity with GhECRs in their binding sites. However, a few motifs, including that of the nudix hydrolase-15 domain, showed weak similarities to the glycine-rich region 225-GSGGYQIPH/RG-234 of GhECRs. Because most known motifs for nucleotide binding are glycine rich (Rao and Rossmann, 1973), this was identified as the primary candidate for the NADP/NAD-binding site of GhECRs. This anticipation was supported by sequence alignment of residues L220–F235 of GhECRs with the C-termini of rat and human 5α-steroid reductases (Fig. 2B), which catalyse reductions of the double bond between the 4 and 5 carbon atoms of steroids. G184 (G188) was shown to be involved in the NADP/NAD binding of the rat (human) enzyme (Russell and Wilson, 1994; Bhattacharyya and Collins, 2001).
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequence alignment of GhECR1 and GhECR2. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of GhECR1 (GenBank accession no. ABV60088) and GhECR2 (ABV60089) with orthologues from A. thaliana (NP_191096), N. benthamiana (AAY17262), humans (AAP36986), rat (NP_612558), and S. cerevisiae (NP_010269). Black shading indicates strictly conserved residues, whereas grey shading indicates regions with less strict conservation. (B) Amino acid sequence alignment of plant ECRs with rat and human 5α-steroid reductases identified a putative NADPH-binding region.
Amino acid sequence alignment of GhECR1 and GhECR2. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment of GhECR1 (GenBank accession no. ABV60088) and GhECR2 (ABV60089) with orthologues from A. thaliana (NP_191096), N. benthamiana (AAY17262), humans (AAP36986), rat (NP_612558), and S. cerevisiae (NP_010269). Black shading indicates strictly conserved residues, whereas grey shading indicates regions with less strict conservation. (B) Amino acid sequence alignment of plant ECRs with rat and human 5α-steroid reductases identified a putative NADPH-binding region.
Functional characterization of wild-type cotton ECR genes in the yeast tsc13Δ mutant
Tsc13p, as the only protein with ECR function in VLCFA production in S. cerevisiae, is essential for survival in cells (Kohlwein ). To address the biological function of the cotton genes, the viability of the tsc13Δ mutant cells complemented by GhECR was examined. As shown in Supplemenary Fig. S1 at JXB online and in Fig. 3A, the lethality of the tsc13Δ mutant was rescued when the mutant cells were transformed by yeast expression plasmids carrying the cotton genes. In agreement with the plate assay, tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing GhECR1 and 2 as C-terminally His-tagged proteins showed growth rates close to that of wild-type yeast cells (Fig. 3B). The ER fractions (P85) were separated from the supernatant fractions (S85) by differential centrifugation using total proteins extracted from yeast cells. Immunoblotting of each of the fractions using anti-6×His and anti-ScKar2p indicated that GhECR1 or 2 were present in the same fraction where the ER marker ScKar2p was found (Fig. 3C). Production of VLCFA, especially C26:0, was detected in the tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing GhECR genes (Fig. 3D; Supplementary Table S2). Taken together, the data presented here indicated that both of the GhECR genes were able to complement the synthetic lethal phenotype of tsc13Δ and hence were expressing functional cotton ECRs.
Fig. 3.
The viability of S. cerevisiae tsc13Δ mutant cells is restored by functional complementation of individual GhECR genes. (A) Complementation of S. cerevisiae tsc13Δ mutant cells by individual GhECR genes. (B) Growth curve of S. cerevisiae tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing GhECR1 or 2. (C) GhECRs were localized in microsomal fractions together with the ER marker ScKar2p. The fractions of the supernatant (S85) and the pellet (P85) were separated from the total lysate (see Materials and methods). (D) GC analyses of total fatty acids extracted from wild-type W1536 5B and tsc13Δ mutant cells complemented by GhECR1 or 2.
The viability of S. cerevisiaetsc13Δ mutant cells is restored by functional complementation of individual GhECR genes. (A) Complementation of S. cerevisiaetsc13Δ mutant cells by individual GhECR genes. (B) Growth curve of S. cerevisiaetsc13Δ mutant cells expressing GhECR1 or 2. (C) GhECRs were localized in microsomal fractions together with the ER marker ScKar2p. The fractions of the supernatant (S85) and the pellet (P85) were separated from the total lysate (see Materials and methods). (D) GC analyses of total fatty acids extracted from wild-type W1536 5B and tsc13Δ mutant cells complemented by GhECR1 or 2.
Identification of amino acid residues involved in the NADPH-binding site of GhECR2
As shown in Fig. 2B, the region G225–G234 from both GhECRs was predicted to be involved in binding of NADPH. A complete set of point mutations was constructed in which single amino acid residues of GhECR2 in this region were changed into alanine by site-directed mutagenesis, and the resulting cotton ECR mutants were expressed in the tsc13Δ mutant. Of the mutant proteins tested, six restored the growth defect of the tsc13Δ cells on Sc+FAA plates, as did the wild-type GhECR2 (Fig. 4A). However, the four mutants G225A, I231A, P232A, and G234A were not able to complement the tsc13Δ mutant (Fig. 4A). Immunoblot analysis confirmed that all these variants were present at similar levels to wild-type GhECR2 (Fig. 4B). These data revealed that G225, I231, P232, and G234 were critical for the functions of GhECR2.
Fig. 4.
Screening of GhECR2 variants involved in the putative NADPH-binding site. (A) GhECR2 variants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis and were tested for their activity by complementation of the S. cerevisiae tsc13Δ mutant. Sc-Ura-Trp, synthetic complete medium containing 2% (w/v) D-glucose, but lacking uracil and tryptophan; Sc-Ura+FAA, synthetic complete medium containing 2% (w/v) D-galactose, 0.05% (w/v) D-glucose, and 0.05% (w/v) FAA, but lacking uracil. (B) GhECR2 variants were detected by immunoblotting with anti-6×His antibody.
Screening of GhECR2 variants involved in the putative NADPH-binding site. (A) GhECR2 variants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis and were tested for their activity by complementation of the S. cerevisiaetsc13Δ mutant. Sc-Ura-Trp, synthetic complete medium containing 2% (w/v) D-glucose, but lacking uracil and tryptophan; Sc-Ura+FAA, synthetic complete medium containing 2% (w/v) D-galactose, 0.05% (w/v) D-glucose, and 0.05% (w/v) FAA, but lacking uracil. (B) GhECR2 variants were detected by immunoblotting with anti-6×His antibody.
Mutated GhECR causes a significantly low level of VLCFA
To investigate the effects of the mutated GhECR, the yeasttsc13Δ mutant transformed by both YCplac33-ScTSC13 and pYADE4-GhECR2 was used. A high concentration of glucose is able to shut off the expression of ScTSC13, which is under the control of the GAL1 promoter. When the yeast cells were inoculated from the culture medium containing 2% galactose to medium containing 4% glucose, the growth rates of tsc13Δ cells expressing mutated GhECR genes became slow after 10 h (Fig. 5A). RT-PCR analyses showed that the transcript levels of ScTSC13 decreased in culture medium containing 4% glucose compared with those in 2% galactose (Fig. 5B). Transcription of GhECR2 and its variants was not affected by 4% glucose (Fig. 5C), which was further verified by immunoblotting analyses (Fig. 5D). To avoid non-specific effects caused by prolonged growth inhibition, glucose-treated yeast cells were studied at 12 h after glucose supplementation. Quantitative analyses of the fatty acid composition of yeast cells transformed with wild-type GhECR2 by GC-MS revealed a major product of C26:0 in the cells, whereas the levels of C26:0 and C24:0 were significantly decreased in the four GhECR2 mutated variants (Fig. 5E; Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). Instead, significant accumulation of fatty acids C22:0, C20:0, C18:0, C18-OH, and especially C16-OH was detected in the tsc13Δ cells expressing the GhECR mutated proteins (Fig. 5E). These data suggest that the four residues, G225, I231, P232, and G234, participate in GhECR2 catalysis of VLCFA biosynthesis.
Fig. 5.
Mutated GhECR2 caused reduction of VLCFAs and accumulation of hydroxylated long chain fatty acids. (A) The tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing ScTSC13 and the GhECR2 variant were pre-inoculated in synthetic medium containing 2% galactose. Following dilution of an overnight culture to a fresh synthetic medium containing 4% glucose, starting from OD600 nm equal to 0.05, the cell density as a determination of growth was measured. (B) RT-PCR analyses of transcript levels of ScTSC13 in medium containing 4% glucose at the indicated time, compared with those obtained in 2% galactose. (C) RT-PCR analyses of expression of GhECR2 and its variants in medium containing 4% glucose at 12 h. (D) The important mutated GhECR2 proteins were detected to be expressed by immunoblotting. (E) GC analyses of total fatty acids extracted from the tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing important GhECR2 variants when the transcription of ScTSC13 was inhibited by 4% glucose at 12 h. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA software combined with Tukey's test throughout this figure. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Mutated GhECR2 caused reduction of VLCFAs and accumulation of hydroxylated long chain fatty acids. (A) The tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing ScTSC13 and the GhECR2 variant were pre-inoculated in synthetic medium containing 2% galactose. Following dilution of an overnight culture to a fresh synthetic medium containing 4% glucose, starting from OD600 nm equal to 0.05, the cell density as a determination of growth was measured. (B) RT-PCR analyses of transcript levels of ScTSC13 in medium containing 4% glucose at the indicated time, compared with those obtained in 2% galactose. (C) RT-PCR analyses of expression of GhECR2 and its variants in medium containing 4% glucose at 12 h. (D) The important mutated GhECR2 proteins were detected to be expressed by immunoblotting. (E) GC analyses of total fatty acids extracted from the tsc13Δ mutant cells expressing important GhECR2 variants when the transcription of ScTSC13 was inhibited by 4% glucose at 12 h. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA software combined with Tukey's test throughout this figure. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
A new candidate for the NADPH-binding motif for GhECR
The topology of GhECR2 was predicted based on that of AtECR (Paul ). Based on the analyses of the different mutants, the location of the NADPH-binding motif of GhECR2 was proposed to be facing the cytosolic side of the ER membrane (Fig. 6A). The sequence G(5X)IPXG is comparable with the NADP/NAD-binding sites of NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase (PDB code 2qjo), UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (PDB code 1d1j), and the general stress protein GSP69 (PDB code 1pz1) (Fig. 6B). These amino acids, except for G225, were highly conserved in the nudix hydrolase-15 domain for which the three-dimensional structures are known (NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase, Fig. 6B, C). According to the structure, the counterparts of I231, P232, and G234 (L230, P231, and G233 in Fig. 6C, respectively) existed close to the nucleotide ligand, giving further credence to the suggestion that they may be involved in the binding of NADPH.
Fig. 6.
G(5X)IPXG is a putative novel NADPH-binding motif of GhECR. (A) The position of G(5X)IPXG in the six-membrane-spanning topology of GhECR2. (B) The similarity of putative NADPH-binding sites of GhECR2 to NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase (PDB code 2qjo), UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (PDB code 1d1j), and general stress protein GSP69 (PDB code 1pz1). (C) The structure of the nucleotide-binding motif of NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase with bound ADP-ribose. Sites identical to GhECR are shown in blue.
G(5X)IPXG is a putative novel NADPH-binding motif of GhECR. (A) The position of G(5X)IPXG in the six-membrane-spanning topology of GhECR2. (B) The similarity of putative NADPH-binding sites of GhECR2 to NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase (PDB code 2qjo), UDP-glucose dehydrogenase (PDB code 1d1j), and general stress protein GSP69 (PDB code 1pz1). (C) The structure of the nucleotide-binding motif of NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase with bound ADP-ribose. Sites identical to GhECR are shown in blue.
Discussion
VLCFA biosynthesis plays important roles during plant development (Zheng ; Chen ; Qin ) and its regulation was reported to be mediated by a MYB transcription factor in Arabidopsis (Raffaele ). ECR catalyses the last step of VLCFA biosynthesis and is proposed to be a ubiquitous component of elongase complexes of different plant tissues (Park ; Zheng ), In this study, two cotton ECR genes were cloned, overexpressed, and characterized. Judging from the expression profiles of GhECR genes, GhECR2 may be involved in the cotton fibre fast elongating stage (Fig. 1). This is consistent with the fact that the transcripts of other genes encoding enzymes of VLCFA synthesis as well as production of VLCFAs in cotton fibre cells significantly increased at the same time (Qin ; Shi ). Elevated biosynthesis of VLCFAs during the fibre cell rapid elongation period implicated VLCFAs to serve as precursors of signalling molecules, sphingolipids, and cuticular wax in the process (Zheng ; Qin ). In other plants, the absence or suppression of ECR activity resulted in a reduction of VLCFAs (Park ; Zheng ), emphasizing the function of ECR in fatty acid elongation. Consistent with the fact that higher plants produce variable VLCFA-containing lipids, suberin, and waxes, GhECR2 was also shown to be important for the development of leaves (Fig. 1B).The reaction catalysed by ECR reduces the (trans-2) double bond of trans-2-enoyl-CoA, similar to the activity of characterized 2-enoyl thioester reductases of fatty acid synthesis (Smith, 1994; Airenne ; Gloerich ; Zhang ). Both cotton ECRs were demonstrated to be functional homologues of ScTsc13p by their ability to rescue the growth of the tsc13Δ mutant (Fig. 3). Comparison of the GhECR2 amino acid sequence with the sequences of the other NADPH-binding proteins leads to the identification of a candidate NADPH-binding site (Fig. 2B). In order to determine the importance of this sequence for the protein function, a number of cotton GhECR2 mutants were engineered by site-directed mutagenesis and tested for complementation of the yeasttsc13Δ mutant (Fig. 4). Four residues, G225, I231, P232, and G234, of GhECR2 were shown to be essential for GhECR2 activity (Fig. 4), since substitution of any of the residues by alanine resulted in a loss of growth of tsc13Δ cells, and the decrease of GhECR activity in yeast cells caused a significant reduction of VLCFA biosynthesis (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Fig. S2 at JXB online). Accumulation of C18:0, C20:0, and C22:0, but not C24:0, caused by the variable mutated GhECR2 proteins suggests that GhECR2 has chain length specificity towards the trans-2-enoyl-CoAs which have >24 carbons. This may explain the reason why cotton requires a second ECR gene encoding the enzyme that is responsible for elongation of fatty acids longer than C22. Interestingly, accumulation of hydroxylated long chain fatty acids with C16 chain length was another consequence (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Fig. S2), similar to the higher C16-OH content detected in the ArabidopsisECR mutant cer10 (Zheng ), suggesting that plant ECR affected the biosynthesis of complex sphingolipids in eukaryotes. It is noteworthy that the counterpart of GhECR2 G225 in NMN adenylyltransferase/ADP ribose pyrophosphatase is not directly involved in binding of NADPH (G224 in Fig. 6C). This residue is also not conserved among the nudix hydrolase-15 domains, while it is highly conserved among GhECR homologues (Fig. 2A). Though it appears that none of the known motifs could fully explain each of the important residues of GhECR detected in this study, the G(5X)IPXG motif of the GhECR family can be considered to represent a putative novel NADPH-binding motif, or at least a new variation of the nudix hydrolase-15 motif with a significant change in conformation.The membrane topology of GhECR2 prediction based on the topology of AtECR (Paul ) revealed that the protein spans the membrane six times and that their N- and C-termini are facing the cytosol (Fig. 6A). The proposed NADPH-binding motif G(5X)IPXG is located in a loop between transmembrane domains 4 and 5 (Fig. 6A). This motif positioning at the cytosolic face of the ER membrane was not the site where the catalytic residues were indicated previously (Paul ). The oxidative pentose phosphate pathway is a major source of NADPH for biosynthetic processes such as fatty acid synthesis in non-photosynthetic cells (Debnam and Emes, 1999; Neuhaus and Emes, 2000). Hence, the location of the identified motif was implied to be favoured for binding of the cytosolic NADPH. In conclusion, this study constituted the first characterization of cotton ECRs during cotton fibre elongation, and established a non-classical NADPH-binding motif which was essential for activity. The use of yeast microsomal membranes as a source of protein limits the extent of our studies. The possibilities that the four identified residues affecting GhECR2 activity might be independent of NADPH binding cannot be excluded. Therefore, efforts are underway to engineer GhECRs for structure–function studies, including a direct observation of the molecular interactions between the putative NADPH-binding motif and the cofactor, with purified enzymes in the future.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data are available at JXB online.The tetrad dissection of diploid W1536 TSC13/tsc13Δ cells transformed with pYADE4-GhECR.GC spectra of long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) and very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) from the tsc13Δ mutant complemented by wild-type GhECR2 and its mutant variants.The primers used in the current study.Quantitative analysis of the fatty acid composition of wild-type yeast and tsc13Δ mutant cells complemented by GhECR1 or GhECR2 as reported in Fig. 3.
Authors: Christian J A Sigrist; Lorenzo Cerutti; Nicolas Hulo; Alexandre Gattiker; Laurent Falquet; Marco Pagni; Amos Bairoch; Philipp Bucher Journal: Brief Bioinform Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 11.622
Authors: Gongshe Han; Ken Gable; Sepp D Kohlwein; Frédéric Beaudoin; Johnathan A Napier; Teresa M Dunn Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-06-26 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Srinivasan Ramakrishnan; Melissa D Docampo; James I Macrae; François M Pujol; Carrie F Brooks; Giel G van Dooren; J Kalervo Hiltunen; Alexander J Kastaniotis; Malcolm J McConville; Boris Striepen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Michael Eichenberger; Beata Joanna Lehka; Christophe Folly; David Fischer; Stefan Martens; Ernesto Simón; Michael Naesby Journal: Metab Eng Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 9.783