M M Brouwers1, M van Tongeren, A A Hirst, R W Bretveld, N Roeleveld. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Health Technology Assessment, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop a new up-to-date and comprehensive job exposure matrix (JEM) for estimating exposure to potential endocrine disruptors in epidemiological research. METHODS: Chemicals with endocrine disrupting properties were identified from the literature and classified into 10 chemical groups: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated organic compounds, pesticides, phthalates, organic solvents, bisphenol A, alkylphenolic compounds, brominated flame retardants, metals and a miscellaneous group. Most chemical groups were divided into three to six subgroups. Focusing on the years 1996-2006, three experts scored the probability of exposure to each chemical group and subgroup for 353 job titles as "unlikely" (0), "possible" (1) or "probable" (2). Job titles with positive exposure probability scores were provided with exposure scenarios that described the reasoning behind the scores. RESULTS: Exposure to any chemical group was unlikely for 238 job titles (67%), whereas 102 (29%) job titles were classified as possibly (17%) or probably (12%) exposed to one or several endocrine disruptors. The remaining 13 job titles provided too little information to classify exposure. PAHs, pesticides, phthalates, organic solvents, alkylphenolic compounds and metals were often linked to a job title in the JEM. The remaining chemical groups were found to involve very few occupations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some important limitations, this JEM could be a valuable tool for exposure assessment in studies on the health risks of endocrine disruptors, especially when task specific information is incorporated. The documented exposure scenarios are meant to facilitate further adjustments to the JEM to allow more widespread use.
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to develop a new up-to-date and comprehensive job exposure matrix (JEM) for estimating exposure to potential endocrine disruptors in epidemiological research. METHODS: Chemicals with endocrine disrupting properties were identified from the literature and classified into 10 chemical groups: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated organic compounds, pesticides, phthalates, organic solvents, bisphenol A, alkylphenolic compounds, brominated flame retardants, metals and a miscellaneous group. Most chemical groups were divided into three to six subgroups. Focusing on the years 1996-2006, three experts scored the probability of exposure to each chemical group and subgroup for 353 job titles as "unlikely" (0), "possible" (1) or "probable" (2). Job titles with positive exposure probability scores were provided with exposure scenarios that described the reasoning behind the scores. RESULTS: Exposure to any chemical group was unlikely for 238 job titles (67%), whereas 102 (29%) job titles were classified as possibly (17%) or probably (12%) exposed to one or several endocrine disruptors. The remaining 13 job titles provided too little information to classify exposure. PAHs, pesticides, phthalates, organic solvents, alkylphenolic compounds and metals were often linked to a job title in the JEM. The remaining chemical groups were found to involve very few occupations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some important limitations, this JEM could be a valuable tool for exposure assessment in studies on the health risks of endocrine disruptors, especially when task specific information is incorporated. The documented exposure scenarios are meant to facilitate further adjustments to the JEM to allow more widespread use.
Authors: Eva Andersson; Håkan Westberg; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Anders Magnuson; Bodil Persson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Sara Villeneuve; Diane Cyr; Elsebeth Lynge; Laurent Orsi; Svend Sabroe; Franco Merletti; Giuseppe Gorini; Maria Morales-Suarez-Varela; Wolfgang Ahrens; Cornelia Baumgardt-Elms; Linda Kaerlev; Mikael Eriksson; Lennart Hardell; Joëlle Févotte; Pascal Guénel Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Haotian Wu; Allison J Kupsco; Andrea L Deierlein; Allan C Just; Antonia M Calafat; Emily Oken; Joseph M Braun; Adriana Mercado-Garcia; Alejandra Cantoral; Martha M Téllez-Rojo; Robert O Wright; Andrea A Baccarelli Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: R Prichystalova; E Caron-Beaudoin; L Richardson; E Dirkx; A Amadou; T Zavodna; R Cihak; V Cogliano; J Hynes; L Pelland-St-Pierre; M A Verner; M van Tongeren; V Ho Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Claudia A Snijder; Nel Roeleveld; Egbert Te Velde; Eric A P Steegers; Hein Raat; Albert Hofman; Vincent W V Jaddoe; Alex Burdorf Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2012-01-02 Impact factor: 6.918