Literature DB >> 19285839

Public health implications of wireless technologies.

Cindy Sage1, David O Carpenter.   

Abstract

Global exposures to emerging wireless technologies from applications including mobile phones, cordless phones, DECT phones, WI-FI, WLAN, WiMAX, wireless internet, baby monitors, and others may present serious public health consequences. Evidence supporting a public health risk is documented in the BioInitiative Report. New, biologically based public exposure standards for chronic exposure to low-intensity exposures are warranted. Existing safety standards are obsolete because they are based solely on thermal effects from acute exposures. The rapidly expanding development of new wireless technologies and the long latency for the development of such serious diseases as brain cancers means that failure to take immediate action to reduce risks may result in an epidemic of potentially fatal diseases in the future. Regardless of whether or not the associations are causal, the strengths of the associations are sufficiently strong that in the opinion of the authors, taking action to reduce exposures is imperative, especially for the fetus and children. Such action is fully compatible with the precautionary principle, as enunciated by the Rio Declaration, the European Constitution Principle on Health (Section 3.1) and the European Union Treaties Article 174.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285839     DOI: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathophysiology        ISSN: 0928-4680


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cell phones and glioma risk: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Courtney Corle; Milan Makale; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Cell phone electromagnetic field radiations affect rhizogenesis through impairment of biochemical processes.

Authors:  Harminder Pal Singh; Ved Parkash Sharma; Daizy Rani Batish; Ravinder Kumar Kohli
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  The use of cell phone and insight into its potential human health impacts.

Authors:  Ki-Hyun Kim; Ehsanul Kabir; Shamin Ara Jahan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Association between number of cell phone contracts and brain tumor incidence in nineteen U.S. States.

Authors:  Steven Lehrer; Sheryl Green; Richard G Stock
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  The potential adverse effect of 2.45 GHz microwave radiation on the testes of prenatally exposed peripubertal male rats.

Authors:  Sandra Andrašková; Katarína Holovská; Zuzana Ševčíková; Zuzana Andrejčáková; Štefan Tóth; Marcela Martončíková; Enikö Račeková; Viera Almášiová
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Potential influence of prenatal 2.45 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure on Wistar albino rat testis.

Authors:  Viera Almášiová; Katarína Holovská; Sandra Andrašková; Viera Cigánková; Zuzana Ševčíková; Adam Raček; Zuzana Andrejčáková; Katarína Beňová; Štefan Tóth; Eva Tvrdá; Ján Molnár; Enikö Račeková
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 7.  Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline.

Authors:  Richard Hammerschlag; Michael Levin; Rollin McCraty; Namuun Bat; John A Ives; Susan K Lutgendorf; James L Oschman
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-11-01

8.  LBMR: Load-Balanced Multipath Routing for Wireless Data-Intensive Transmission in Real-Time Medical Monitoring.

Authors:  Chinyang Henry Tseng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Effect of Microwave Wi-Fi Radiation at Frequency of 2.4 GHz on Epileptic Behavior of Rats.

Authors:  Mahmoudi A; Shojaeifard M B; Nematollahii S; Mortazavi S M J; Mehdizadeh A R
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 10.  The Critical Importance of Molecular Biomarkers and Imaging in the Study of Electrohypersensitivity. A Scientific Consensus International Report.

Authors:  Dominique Belpomme; George L Carlo; Philippe Irigaray; David O Carpenter; Lennart Hardell; Michael Kundi; Igor Belyaev; Magda Havas; Franz Adlkofer; Gunnar Heuser; Anthony B Miller; Daniela Caccamo; Chiara De Luca; Lebrecht von Klitzing; Martin L Pall; Priyanka Bandara; Yael Stein; Cindy Sage; Morando Soffritti; Devra Davis; Joel M Moskowitz; S M J Mortazavi; Martha R Herbert; Hanns Moshammer; Gerard Ledoigt; Robert Turner; Anthony Tweedale; Pilar Muñoz-Calero; Iris Udasin; Tarmo Koppel; Ernesto Burgio; André Vander Vorst
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.