Literature DB >> 19285524

Factors associated with response to a follow-up postal questionnaire in a cohort of American Indians.

Sandra L Edwards1, Martha L Slattery, Alison M Edwards, Carol Sweeney, Maureen A Murtaugh, Leslie E Palmer, Lillian Tom-Orme.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to collect pilot data on response rates to a follow-up postal questionnaire in a cohort of American Indians living in the Southwestern United States. We tested the effect of questionnaire length on response.
METHODS: Cohort members were American Indian adults aged 18 and over who completed the baseline study visit. Study participants (N=1587), cohort members who completed the baseline study visit during the first year of enrollment, were randomized into two groups to receive either an 18-page or 3-page follow-up postal questionnaire. Data were collected between October 2005 and March 2006.
RESULTS: The response rates after two questionnaire mailings and a reminder postcard were significantly higher for the short versus the long (56.2%, 48.1% p= < 0.01) questionnaire. Being female and being aged 50 or older were associated with returning a completed questionnaire. A reminder postcard and second mailing improved response by 11.7% and 13.4% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that a postal questionnaire can be used in a cohort of American Indians living in the Southwest, but suggest that questionnaires should be short and repeat mailings are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19285524      PMCID: PMC2925509          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  11 in total

Review 1.  Practicing participatory research in American Indian communities.

Authors:  S M Davis; R Reid
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective.

Authors:  M Booth
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The Strong Heart Study: interaction with and benefit to American Indian communities.

Authors:  B H Sambo
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  Development and use of touch-screen audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in a study of American Indians.

Authors:  Sandra L Edwards; Martha L Slattery; Maureen A Murtaugh; Roger L Edwards; James Bryner; Mindy Pearson; Amy Rogers; Alison M Edwards; Lillian Tom-Orme
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Rationale, design and methodology for the Navajo Health and Nutrition Survey.

Authors:  L L White; H I Goldberg; T J Gilbert; C Ballew; J M Mendlein; D G Peter; C A Percy; A H Mokdad
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A computer-assisted data collection system for use in a multicenter study of American Indians and Alaska Natives: SCAPES.

Authors:  Roger L Edwards; Sandra L Edwards; James Bryner; Kelly Cunningham; Amy Rogers; Martha L Slattery
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Development, implementation, and evaluation of a computerized self-administered diet history questionnaire for use in studies of American Indian and Alaskan native people.

Authors:  Martha L Slattery; Maureen A Murtaugh; Mary Catherine Schumacher; Jennifer Johnson; Sandra Edwards; Roger Edwards; Joan Benson; Lillian Tom-Orme; Anne P Lanier
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2008-01

Review 9.  Retaining and tracking cohort study members.

Authors:  J R Hunt; E White
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  A prospective cohort of American Indian and Alaska Native people: study design, methods, and implementation.

Authors:  M L Slattery; M C Schumacher; A P Lanier; S Edwards; R Edwards; M A Murtaugh; J Sandidge; G E Day; D Kaufman; S Kanekar; L Tom-Orme; J A Henderson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  2 in total

1.  A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys.

Authors:  D C Glass; H L Kelsall; C Slegers; A B Forbes; B Loff; D Zion; L Fritschi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Alaska Native Patient and Provider Perspectives on the Multitarget Stool DNA Test Compared With Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Diana G Redwood; Ian D Blake; Ellen M Provost; John B Kisiel; Frank D Sacco; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.