| Literature DB >> 19284554 |
Claudia Greco1, Gaetano Vitelli, Giuseppe Vercillo, Rosa Vona, Diana Giannarelli, Isabella Sperduti, Francesco Pisani, Ettore Capoluongo, Maria Concetta Petti, Franco Ameglio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum levels of IGF-I in patients affected with multiple myeloma (MM) have been scarcely studied. The present study is aimed to explore this point comparing 55 healthy subjects, 71 monoclonal gammopaties of uncertain significance (MGUS) and 77 overt MM patients. In the same subjects, basic FGF and VEGF, have been detected. All three mediators were analyzed in function of K-ras mutation and melphalan response. Concerning IGF-I, two representative monitoring examples have also been added.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19284554 PMCID: PMC2663546 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-35
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Main characteristics of MGUS, MM patients and healthy controls
| Group (n) | MGUS (71) | MM (77) | Control (55) |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 38 | 49 | 28 |
| Female | 33 | 28 | 27 |
| Age (y) | |||
| 65.9 ± 10.5 | 66.7 ± 10.7 | 59.6 ± 14.5 | |
| Isotype (H) | |||
| IgG | 62 | 48 | -- |
| IgA | 3 | 28 | -- |
| IgM | 6 | -- | -- |
| IgD | -- | 1 | -- |
| Isotype (L) | |||
| K | 38 | 54 | -- |
| λ | 33 | 23 | -- |
| s-M Protein (g/L) | |||
| 9.42 ± 4.61 | 25.8 ± 10.7 | -- | |
| Bence Jones | |||
| Yes | 41 | 63 | -- |
| No | 30 | 14 | -- |
| Clinical stage (*) | |||
| -- | I – II | -- |
Age is given as mean ± SD. MGUS vs MM: p = 0.11; MGUS vs CTR: p = 0.005; MM vs CTR: p = 0.0001; Gender: MGUS vs MM: p = 0.30; MGUS vs CTR: p = 0.91; MM vs CTR: p = 0.21. s-M Protein concentration is expressed as mean ± SD. MGUS vs MM: p = 0.0001 (*) according to the Durie & Salmon criteria [26].
Figure 1Serial measurements of IGF-1 and serum M-Protein (s-MP) from diagnosis (0) to last follow-up before death in two MM patients. Serum MP concentrations were derived from medical records. The first arrow indicates when MP treatment started, according to the protocol described in "Methods; the others two arrows indicate the repetition of new cycles of therapy due to disease progression. [symbols: cube = IGF-I; diamond = s-M protein].
Serum levels of IGF-I, betaFGF and VEGF in Control, MGUS and MM
| Group | N° | IGF-I | B-FGF | VEGF |
| Controls | 55 | 135.5 | 1.62 | 1.25 |
| MGUS | 71 | 111.3 | 2.08 | 1.12 |
| MM | 77 | 78 | 2.37 | 1.37 |
| P1 | <.0001 | 0.01 | 0.19 | |
| P2 | -- | <.0001 | .001 | .57 |
| P3 | -- | <.0001 | .27 | .14 |
| P4 | -- | <.0001 | .02 | .14 |
A statistical analysis has been performed both on the three groups together and on the different couple of groups.
Cytokine levels are given as median (range). P1 = univariate analysis, Kruskall-Wallis test on the three groups. P2 = univariate analysis, Mann Whitney test on Controls vs MGUS. P3 = univariate analysis, Mann Whitney test on MGUS vs MM. P4 = univariate analysis, Mann Whitney test on Controls vs MM.
The IGF-I behaviour has been also confirmed by logistic regression analysis after data correction for age and gender, as described in the text.
K-ras gene status and response to therapy
| Group | K12- | Positive therapy response (%) | P | |
| Mutant | Wild type | |||
| Controls | 0/75 (0) | __ | __ | __ |
| MGUS | 1/66 (1.5) | __ | __ | __ |
| MM | 20/73 (27.4) | 26.9 | 58.3 | 0.01 |
Statistical significance for K12-ras gene mutation: Control vs MGUS p = 0.95, Control vs MM p = 0.0001, MGUS vs MM p < 0.0001, Positive therapy response: minor response and no change disease (see Methods).