Literature DB >> 19284244

Stereotactic coordinates associated with facial musculature contraction during high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.

Alessandra A Gorgulho1, Donald C Shields, Dennis Malkasian, Eric Behnke, Antonio A F Desalles.   

Abstract

OBJECT: High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in patients with parkinsonian symptoms is often used to ameliorate debilitating motor symptoms associated with this condition. However, individual variability in the shape and orientation of this relatively small nucleus results in multiple side effects related to the spread of electrical current to surrounding structures. Specifically, contraction of the muscles of facial expression is noted in a small percentage of patients, although the precise mechanism remains poorly understood.
METHODS: Facial muscle contraction was triggered by high-frequency stimulation of 49 contacts in 18 patients undergoing deep brain stimulation of the STN. The mean coordinates of these individual contacts relative to the anterior commissure-posterior commissure midpoint (also called the midcommissural point) were calculated to determine the location or structure(s) most often associated with facial contraction during physiological macrostimulation.
RESULTS: The x, y, and z coordinates associated with contraction of the facial musculature were found to be 11.52, 1.29, and 1.15 mm lateral, posterior, and inferior to the midcommissural point, respectively. This location, along the lateral-anterior-superior border of the STN, may allow for the spread of electrical current to the fields of Forel, zona incerta, and/or descending corticospinal/corticobulbar tracts. Because stimulation of corticobulbar tracts produces similar findings, these results are best explained by the spread of electrical current to nearby internal capsule axons coursing lateral to the STN.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, if intraoperative deep brain stimulation lead testing results in facial musculature contraction, placement of the electrode in a more medial, posterior position may reduce the amount of current spread to corticobulbar fibers and resolve this side effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19284244     DOI: 10.3171/JNS.2008.10.JNS08835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  3 in total

1.  Muscle Contraction as a False Localizing Sign During Intraoperative Macrostimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus.

Authors:  Gian D Pal; Sepehr Sani; Leo Verhagen
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2015-02-24

2.  Hypothalamic deep brain stimulation reduces weight gain in an obesity-animal model.

Authors:  William P Melega; Goran Lacan; Alessandra A Gorgulho; Eric J Behnke; Antonio A F De Salles
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Coordinate-based lead location does not predict Parkinson's disease deep brain stimulation outcome.

Authors:  Kelsey A Nestor; Jacob D Jones; Christopher R Butson; Takashi Morishita; Charles E Jacobson; David A Peace; Dennis Chen; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.