Literature DB >> 19283582

An implementation study of neonatal hearing screening in the Netherlands.

Noëlle Uilenburg1, Minca Kauffman-de Boer, Kitty van der Ploeg, Anne Marie Oudesluys-Murphy, Paul Verkerk.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether universal neonatal hearing screening could be integrated in the youth health care program. The screening was performed by nurses of the well baby clinics. A three stage transient evoked otoacoustic emission screening was performed in three different screening settings in order to study the most effective set up regarding participation, refer rates, and costs. In one setting parents visited the well baby clinic, and in two settings babies were screened at home (either in combination with the screening for metabolic diseases or during an intake visit). Screening was performed on 3114 healthy newborns. The setting where universal neonatal hearing screening is integrated with the screening for metabolic diseases, proved to be most efficient and effective. The participation rate of 88.9% was highest in this setting and the overall refer rate (1.4%) was the lowest. The implementation of universal neonatal hearing screening by the well baby clinic nurses was judged to be possible. The results of this study formed the basis for nationwide implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283582     DOI: 10.1080/14992020802448992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  7 in total

1.  Interdisciplinary approach to design, performance, and quality management in a multicenter newborn hearing screening project. Discussion of the results of newborn hearing screening in Hamburg (part II).

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Rohlfs; Thomas Wiesner; Holger Drews; Frank Müller; Achim Breitfuss; Regina Schiller; Markus Hess
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  [Quality of universal newborn hearing screening results : Multicenter analysis of data recorded between 2009 and 2012 in four German states].

Authors:  P Matulat; S Fabian; A Köhn; M Spormann-Lagodziski; R Lang-Roth; A Rissmann; M Gross; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations.

Authors:  George X Papacharalampous; Thomas P Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios I Davilis; Ioannis E Xenellis; Stavros G Korres
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Economic Evaluations of Childhood Hearing Loss Screening Programmes: A Systematic Review and Critique.

Authors:  Rajan Sharma; Yuanyuan Gu; Teresa Y C Ching; Vivienne Marnane; Bonny Parkinson
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.561

Review 5.  The cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen Colgan; Lisa Gold; Karen Wirth; Teresa Ching; Zeffie Poulakis; Field Rickards; Melissa Wake
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 6.  Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening Facing Globally Growing Numbers of People Suffering from Disabling Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Katrin Neumann; Shelly Chadha; George Tavartkiladze; Xingkuan Bu; Karl R White
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2019-01-18

7.  Protocol and programme factors associated with referral and loss to follow-up from newborn hearing screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Allison R Mackey; Andrea M L Bussé; Valeria Del Vecchio; Elina Mäki-Torkko; Inger M Uhlén
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.567

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.