OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation of upper-limb sensorimotor function in children with motor dysfunctions is primarily based on movement training. This study developed a virtual-reality based, paediatric interactive therapy system (PITS) that allows children to practice specific movements of the upper limbs with immediate feedback about their motor performance. METHODS: The system was tested on five children with motor dysfunctions over 3 weeks of training. Pre- and post-assessment was conducted before and after the training period. RESULTS: Results of the pilot study show improvements of hand function in the test scores (except one patient). Patient motivation was high and maintained over the course of the therapy sessions. CONCLUSION: PITS is an applicable VR-system which can be feasibly applied during the rehabilitation of children with upper limb motor dysfunctions. Further investigation is necessary to determine if the system provides significantly improved results compared to conventional therapies, both in terms of motor function outcomes and patient motivation.
OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation of upper-limb sensorimotor function in children with motor dysfunctions is primarily based on movement training. This study developed a virtual-reality based, paediatric interactive therapy system (PITS) that allows children to practice specific movements of the upper limbs with immediate feedback about their motor performance. METHODS: The system was tested on five children with motor dysfunctions over 3 weeks of training. Pre- and post-assessment was conducted before and after the training period. RESULTS: Results of the pilot study show improvements of hand function in the test scores (except one patient). Patient motivation was high and maintained over the course of the therapy sessions. CONCLUSION:PITS is an applicable VR-system which can be feasibly applied during the rehabilitation of children with upper limb motor dysfunctions. Further investigation is necessary to determine if the system provides significantly improved results compared to conventional therapies, both in terms of motor function outcomes and patient motivation.
Authors: Gerard G Fluet; Qinyin Qiu; Donna Kelly; Heta D Parikh; Diego Ramirez; Soha Saleh; Sergei V Adamovich Journal: Dev Neurorehabil Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.308
Authors: Bernadette C Tobler-Ammann; Elif Surer; Ruud H Knols; N Alberto Borghese; Eling D de Bruin Journal: JMIR Serious Games Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 4.143
Authors: Roslyn N Boyd; Emmah Baque; Adina Piovesana; Stephanie Ross; Jenny Ziviani; Leanne Sakzewski; Lee Barber; Owen Lloyd; Lynne McKinlay; Koa Whittingham; Anthony C Smith; Stephen Rose; Simona Fiori; Ross Cunnington; Robert Ware; Melinda Lewis; Tracy A Comans; Paul A Scuffham Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Johannes Brand; Marco Piccirelli; Marie-Claude Hepp-Reymond; Manfred Morari; Lars Michels; Kynan Eng Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Victor M Peñeñory; Cristina Manresa-Yee; Inmaculada Riquelme; Cesar A Collazos; Habib M Fardoun Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-08-03 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Jiří Keller; Ivana Štětkářová; Vince Macri; Simone Kühn; Jakub Pětioký; Stefano Gualeni; С Douglas Simmons; Sajay Arthanat; Paul Zilber Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 4.262