BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether or not an elevated ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) level provides any additional prognostic information to the validated Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: One hundred seven consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary PCI were included. The incidence of 30-day death was the prespecified primary end point. Serum IMA was measured immediately at hospital arrival. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary end point was 6.5%. A significant predictive value of IMA in relation to the primary end point was indicated by an area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, increased IMA remained a significant predictor of the primary end point after adjustment for TIMI risk predictors (p = 0.019). The area under the ROC curve for the TIMI risk score was 0.68 (p = 0.03). The addition of IMA to the TIMI risk score did not improve its prognostic value (area under the ROC curve 0.60, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: IMA levels obtained at admission are a powerful indicator of short-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, but do not seem to be a marker that adds prognostic information to the validated STEMI TIMI risk score.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether or not an elevated ischaemia-modified albumin (IMA) level provides any additional prognostic information to the validated Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: One hundred seven consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary PCI were included. The incidence of 30-day death was the prespecified primary end point. Serum IMA was measured immediately at hospital arrival. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary end point was 6.5%. A significant predictive value of IMA in relation to the primary end point was indicated by an area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, increased IMA remained a significant predictor of the primary end point after adjustment for TIMI risk predictors (p = 0.019). The area under the ROC curve for the TIMI risk score was 0.68 (p = 0.03). The addition of IMA to the TIMI risk score did not improve its prognostic value (area under the ROC curve 0.60, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION:IMA levels obtained at admission are a powerful indicator of short-term mortality in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI, but do not seem to be a marker that adds prognostic information to the validated STEMI TIMI risk score.
Authors: Maria Gabriela Valle Gottlieb; Ivana Beatrice Mânica da Cruz; Marta M F Duarte; Rafael Noal Moresco; Mário Wiehe; Carla Helena Augustin Schwanke; Luiz Carlos Bodanese Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-12-16 Impact factor: 5.958