Literature DB >> 19283413

Effect of fibrin glue on the prevention of persistent cerebral spinal fluid leakage after incidental durotomy during lumbar spinal surgery.

Brian T Jankowitz1, Dave S Atteberry, Peter C Gerszten, Patricia Karausky, Boyle C Cheng, Ryan Faught, William C Welch.   

Abstract

Approximately one million spinal surgeries are performed in the United States each year. The risk of an incidental durotomy (ID) and resultant persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a significant concern for surgeons, as this complication has been associated with increased length of hospitalization, worse neurological outcome, and the development of CSF fistulae. Augmentation of standard dural suture repair with the application of fibrin glue has been suggested to reduce the frequency of these complications. This study examined unintended durotomies during lumbar spine surgery in a large surgical patient cohort and the impact of fibrin glue usage as part of the ID repair on the incidence of persistent CSF leakage. A retrospective analysis of 4,835 surgical procedures of the lumbar spine from a single institution over a 10-year period was performed to determine the rate of ID. The 90-day clinical course of these patients was evaluated. Clinical examination, B-2 transferrin assay, and radiographic imaging were utilized to determine the number of persistent CSF leaks after repair with or without fibrin glue. Five hundred forty-seven patients (11.3%) experienced a durotomy during surgery. Of this cohort, fibrin glue was used in the dural repair in 278 patients (50.8%). Logistic models evaluating age, sex, redo surgery, and the use of fibrin glue revealed that prior lumbar spinal surgery was the only univariate predictor of persistent CSF leak, conferring a 2.8-fold increase in risk. A persistent CSF leak, defined as continued drainage of CSF from the operative incision within 90 days of the surgery that required an intervention greater than simple bed rest or over-sewing of the wound, was noted in a total of 64 patients (11.7%). This persistent CSF leak rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in patients with prior lumbar surgery (21%) versus those undergoing their first spine surgery (9%). There was no statistical difference in persistent CSF leak between those cases in which fibrin glue was used at the time of surgery and those in which fibrin glue was not used. There were no complications associated with the use of fibrin glue. A history of prior surgery significantly increases the incidence of durotomy during elective lumbar spine surgery. In patients who experienced a durotomy during lumbar spine surgery, the use of fibrin glue for dural repair did not significantly decrease the incidence of a persistent CSF leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283413      PMCID: PMC2899517          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0928-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  26 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery: a review.

Authors:  S J Bosacco; M J Gardner; J T Guille
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A new cause of chronic meningitis: infected lumbar pseudomeningocele.

Authors:  J Koo; R Adamson; F C Wagner; D B Hrdy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Long-term results of lumbar spine surgery complicated by unintended incidental durotomy.

Authors:  A A Jones; J L Stambough; R A Balderston; R H Rothman; R E Booth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant in patients undergoing resternotomy or reoperation after cardiac operations. A multicenter study.

Authors:  J Rousou; S Levitsky; L Gonzalez-Lavin; D Cosgrove; D Magilligan; C Weldon; C Hiebert; P Hess; L Joyce; J Bergsland
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Extradural pseudocysts. A cause of pain after lumbar-disc operation.

Authors:  S E Borgesen; P S Vang
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1973

6.  Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  D Stolke; W P Sollmann; V Seifert
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Spinal epidural abscess.

Authors:  E F Verner; D M Musher
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.456

8.  Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery.

Authors:  F J Eismont; S W Wiesel; R H Rothman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The multiply operated lumbar spine.

Authors:  S W Wiesel
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1985

10.  Comparative transoral dural closure techniques: a canine model.

Authors:  M N Hadley; N A Martin; R F Spetzler; V K Sonntag; P C Johnson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  46 in total

1.  Incidental durotomy in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomes in the Spine Tango registry.

Authors:  Christian Herren; Rolf Sobottke; Anne F Mannion; Thomas Zweig; Everard Munting; Philippe Otten; Tim Pigott; Jan Siewe; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Expert's comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled ''Intracranial hypotension with a sixth cranial nerve palsy subsequent to massive thoracic CSF hygroma: a rare complication of thoracic disc excision" (by A. Khurana, J. Brousil, A. Russo, A. Evans, N. A. Quraishi, B. M. Boszczyk doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2818-1).

Authors:  William C Welch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Implications of different patterns of "double-layer sign" in cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  Haisong Yang; Lili Yang; Deyu Chen; Xinwei Wang; Xuhua Lu; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps.

Authors:  Luca Papavero; Nils Engler; Ralph Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Iatrogenic dural tear in endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: full endoscopic dural suture repair (Youn's technique).

Authors:  Jong Ki Shin; Myung Soo Youn; Yoon Jae Seong; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  CSF complications following intradural spinal surgeries in children.

Authors:  Victor Liu; Christopher Gillis; Doug Cochrane; Ash Singhal; Paul Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  From surgery to neurosurgery: our experience on the efficacy of fleece-bound sealing (TachoSil®) for dural repair.

Authors:  S Ulivieri; G Peri; G Tiezzi; E Mileo; A Giorgio; G Oliveri
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

9.  Do surgeon credentials affect the rate of incidental durotomy during spine surgery.

Authors:  N J Murray; A K Demetriades; D Rolton; C Nnadi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Dural tears in primary decompressive lumbar surgery. Is primary repair necessary for a good outcome?

Authors:  Sean Grannum; Mohammed Shakil Patel; Fahad Attar; Martyn Newey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.