Literature DB >> 19283240

GPs' concerns about medicolegal issues - How it affects their practice.

Louise Nash1, Merrilyn Walton, Michele Daly, Maree Johnson, Garry Walter, Elizabeth van Ekert, Simon Willcock, Chris Tennant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practitioners' concerns about medicolegal issues have been shown to influence the practice of medicine. This research looks at GPs' beliefs about medicolegal issues and how medicolegal concerns affect their practice.
METHODS: A descriptive comparative design was used. A cross sectional self report survey was sent to 1239 GPs, 566 responded (46% response rate). Responses were considered as a group, and then comparisons were made between those who had experienced a medicolegal matter and those who had not. This data was sourced from surveys and medicolegal insurer records.
RESULTS: General practitioners with previous medicolegal experiences were more likely than their colleagues to report believing the law required them to make perfect decisions and that medicolegal factors made them consider early retirement from medicine. They were also less likely to believe that inadequate communication is a factor in most complaints. More than half the GPs reported having made practice changes due to medicolegal concerns in the following areas: test ordering (73%); specialist referrals (66%); systems to track test results (70%); and communication of risk to patients (68%). Other changes were reported less frequently. DISCUSSION: This study found that GPs' concerns about medicolegal matters impact on their practise of medicine. While greater awareness of medicolegal issues may lead to positive impacts, the negative impact of their concerns is that some changes arise from anxiety about medicolegal matters rather than from the exercise of good clinical judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19283240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Fam Physician        ISSN: 0300-8495


  6 in total

1.  To Drive or Not to Drive: Assessment Dilemmas for GPs.

Authors:  J Sims; S Rouse-Watson; P Schattner; A Beveridge; K M Jones
Journal:  Int J Family Med       Date:  2012-01-15

2.  The impact of complaints procedures on the welfare, health and clinical practise of 7926 doctors in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Tom Bourne; Laure Wynants; Mike Peters; Chantal Van Audenhove; Dirk Timmerman; Ben Van Calster; Maria Jalmbrant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Doctors' perception of support and the processes involved in complaints investigations and how these relate to welfare and defensive practice: a cross-sectional survey of the UK physicians.

Authors:  Tom Bourne; Bavo De Cock; Laure Wynants; Mike Peters; Chantal Van Audenhove; Dirk Timmerman; Ben Van Calster; Maria Jalmbrant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure.

Authors:  Berber S Laarman; Renée Jr Bouwman; Anke Je de Veer; Michelle Hendriks; Roland D Friele
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Personal and Professional Impact of Patients' Complaints on Doctors-A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Wallace; J Lowry; S M Smith; T Fahey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.