Literature DB >> 19282740

Value of immediate preprocedure magnetic resonance imaging in patients scheduled to undergo vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.

Becky K Benz1, John M Gemery, John J McIntyre, Clifford J Eskey.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of additional vertebral compression fractures diagnosed with repeat MRI immediately before vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral compression fractures, which occur frequently in the elderly, are more likely in patients with prior vertebral compression fracture. When patients are evaluated for vertebroplasty, it is important to identify all unhealed fractures for effective treatment planning.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, we reviewed the records of all patients (n = 194) treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty over a 6-year period at our institution, and identified all patients who had undergone a repeat MRI within 7 days of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. These studies were obtained as part of a clinical protocol prescribing a repeat MRI for any patient whose MRI had been obtained more than 3 months before the evaluation, or who had a change in their pain between referral and evaluation.
RESULTS: Twenty patients met inclusion criteria for the immediate preprocedure MRI protocol. A total of 14 new fractures in 11 patients were discovered on the immediate preprocedure MRI. Of these 14, 6 had less than 15% loss of height, making them potentially occult on radiographs; 3 fractures developed in 2 patients who had no change in back pain.
CONCLUSION: In select candidates for vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, a repeat preprocedure MRI obtained within 1 week can help ensure that all painful fractures are treated. There is demonstrable value in this protocol for patients with an imaging evaluation over 3 months old or who have had any change in symptoms since the initial imaging workup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19282740     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819740bb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  [Vertebro- and kyphoplasty for percutaneous cement augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures].

Authors:  D Boluki; J Grifka
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Diagnosis of painful cemented vertebrae from failed vertebroplasty: modified dynamic radiographs play an important role.

Authors:  Yen-Jen Chen; Hui-Yi Chen; Hsien-Te Chen; Ruey-Mo Lin; Horng-Chaung Hsu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Osteoporotic vertebral fractures without compression: key factors of diagnosis and initial outcome of treatment with cement augmentation.

Authors:  Haiqing Mao; Jun Zou; Dechun Geng; Xuesong Zhu; Mo Zhu; Weimin Jiang; Huilin Yang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Comparative review of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Fernando Ruiz Santiago; Alicia Santiago Chinchilla; Luis Guzmán Álvarez; Antonio Luis Pérez Abela; Maria Del Mar Castellano García; Miguel Pajares López
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-28

5.  The value of dynamic radiographs in diagnosing painful vertebrae in osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  Y-J Chen; D-F Lo; C-H Chang; H-T Chen; H-C Hsu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Vertebral augmentation by kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: 8 years experience outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Kaan Yaltirik; Ahmed M Ashour; Conner R Reis; Selçuk Özdoğan; Başar Atalay
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Significance of preoperative MRI in establishing levels of augmentation for percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Paul J Graziotti; Cherie R Graziotti; Adele M Sangster
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.133

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.