Literature DB >> 19282484

Achieving measles control: lessons from the 2002-06 measles control strategy for Uganda.

William B Mbabazi1, Miriam Nanyunja, Issa Makumbi, Fiona Braka, Frederick N Baliraine, Annet Kisakye, Josephine Bwogi, Possy Mugyenyi, Eva Kabwongera, Rosamund F Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND The 2002-06 measles control strategy for Uganda was implemented to strengthen routine immunization, undertake large-scale catch-up and follow-up vaccination campaigns, and to initiate nationwide case-based, laboratory-backed measles surveillance. This study examines the impact of this strategy on the epidemiology of measles in Uganda, and the lessons learnt. METHODS Number of measles cases and routine measles vaccination coverage reported by each district were obtained from the National Health Management Information System reports of 1997 to 2007. The immunization coverage by district in a given year was calculated by dividing the number of children immunized by the projected population in the same age category. Annual measles incidence for each year was derived by dividing the number of cases in a year by the mid-year projected population. Commercial measles IgM enzyme-linked immunoassay kits were used to confirm measles cases. RESULTS Routine measles immunization coverage increased from 64% in 1997 to 90% in 2004, then stabilized around 87%. The 2003 national measles catch-up and 2006 follow-up campaigns reached 100% of children targeted with a measles supplemental dose. Over 80% coverage was also achieved with other child survival interventions. Case-based measles surveillance was rolled out nationwide to provide continuous epidemiological monitoring of measles occurrence. Following a 93% decline in measles incidence and no measles deaths, epidemic resurgence of measles occurred 3 years after a measles campaign targeting a wide age group, but no indigenous measles virus (D(10)) was isolated. Recurrence was delayed in regions where children were offered an early second opportunity for measles vaccination. CONCLUSION The integrated routine and campaign approach to providing a second opportunity for measles vaccination is effective in interrupting indigenous measles transmission and can be used to deliver other child survival interventions. Measles control can be sustained and the inter-epidemic interval lengthened by offering an early second opportunity for measles vaccination through other health delivery strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19282484     DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czp008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy Plan        ISSN: 0268-1080            Impact factor:   3.344


  13 in total

1.  Measles in a tertiary institution in bida, niger state, Nigeria: prevalence, immunization status and mortality pattern.

Authors:  Muhammed Adeboye; Omotayo Adesiyun; Abdulrasheed Adegboye; Edith Eze; Usman Abubakar; Grace Ahmed; Abdullahi Usman; Solomon Amos; Bf Rotimi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2011-03

2.  Impact of measles supplementary immunization activities on reaching children missed by routine programs.

Authors:  Allison Portnoy; Mark Jit; Stéphane Helleringer; Stéphane Verguet
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Possible interruption of measles virus transmission, Uganda, 2006-2009.

Authors:  Frederick N Baliraine; Josephine Bwogi; Henry Bukenya; Ronald Seguya; Theopista Kabaliisa; Annet Kisakye; William B Mbabazi; Sheilagh B Smit
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.883

4.  Timeliness of childhood vaccinations in Kampala Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Juliet N Babirye; Ingunn M S Engebretsen; Frederick Makumbi; Lars T Fadnes; Henry Wamani; Thorkild Tylleskar; Fred Nuwaha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Serum anti-tetanus and measles antibody titres in Ugandan children aged 4 months to 6 years: implications for vaccine programme.

Authors:  Lenesha Warrener; Josephine Bwogi; Nick Andrews; Dhanraj Samuel; Theopista Kabaliisa; Henry Bukenya; Kevin Brown; Martha H Roper; David A Featherstone; David Brown
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Factors affecting the infant antibody response to measles immunisation in Entebbe-Uganda.

Authors:  Dennison Kizito; Robert Tweyongyere; Alice Namatovu; Emily L Webb; Lawrence Muhangi; Swaib A Lule; Henry Bukenya; Stephen Cose; Alison M Elliott
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  The role of health systems and policy in producing behavior and social change to enhance child survival and development in low- and middle-income countries: an examination of the evidence.

Authors:  Luis F Vélez; Mary Sanitato; Donna Barry; Martin Alilio; Franklin Apfel; Gloria Coe; Amparo Garcia; Michelle Kaufman; Jonathan Klein; Vesna Kutlesic; Lisa Meadowcroft; Wendy Nilsen; Gael O'Sullivan; Stefan Peterson; Daniel Raiten; Susan Vorkoper
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014

8.  Evaluation of impact of measles rubella campaign on vaccination coverage and routine immunization services in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Jasim Uddin; Gourab Adhikary; Md Wazed Ali; Shahabuddin Ahmed; Md Shamsuzzaman; Chris Odell; Lauren Hashiguchi; Stephen S Lim; Nurul Alam
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Benchmarking health system performance across regions in Uganda: a systematic analysis of levels and trends in key maternal and child health interventions, 1990-2011.

Authors:  D Allen Roberts; Marie Ng; Gloria Ikilezi; Anne Gasasira; Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Nancy Fullman; Talemwa Nalugwa; Moses Kamya; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Positive predictive value and effectiveness of measles case-based surveillance in Uganda, 2012-2015.

Authors:  Fred Nsubuga; Immaculate Ampaire; Simon Kasasa; Henry Luzze; Annet Kisakye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.