Literature DB >> 19281760

The contribution of different cell lineages to bone repair: exploring a role for muscle stem cells.

Aaron Schindeler1, Renjing Liu, David G Little.   

Abstract

An anabolic response driven by osteoblasts is critical for the process of bone healing. Current evidence suggests that these osteoblasts may arise from multiple tissue types and cell lineages. Stem cells present in the bone marrow, periosteum, local soft tissues, vasculature, and/or circulation have been shown to have osteogenic potential. Transplanted cells from these sources have also been shown to incorporate into induced ectopic bone or repaired bone. While these experiments demonstrate the latent capacity of different lineages to assume an osteoblastic phenotype under pro-osteogenic conditions, the actual contribution of the different lineages to various repair situations in vivo remains unclear. This review explores the data arising from different bone formation and repair models. We propose a model suggesting that cells arising from the local tissues, particularly muscle cells, may play an important role in fracture repair under situations where the periosteal and/or bone marrow progenitor populations are depleted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19281760     DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Differentiation        ISSN: 0301-4681            Impact factor:   3.880


  34 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-bone interactions: basic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Luisella Cianferotti; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Does the cortical bone resorption rate change due to 90Sr-radiation exposure? Analysis of data from Techa Riverside residents.

Authors:  Evgenia I Tolstykh; Natalia B Shagina; Marina O Degteva; Lynn R Anspaugh; Bruce A Napier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Body Management: Mesenchymal Stem Cells Control the Internal Regenerator.

Authors:  Arnold I Caplan; Robert Hariri
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 6.940

4.  Bone vs. fat: embryonic origin of progenitors determines response to androgen in adipocytes and osteoblasts.

Authors:  Kristine M Wiren; Joel G Hashimoto; Anthony A Semirale; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Lineage tracking of mesenchymal and endothelial progenitors in BMP-induced bone formation.

Authors:  Mille Kolind; Justin D Bobyn; Brya G Matthews; Kathy Mikulec; Alastair Aiken; David G Little; Ivo Kalajzic; Aaron Schindeler
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Attenuated human bone morphogenetic protein-2-mediated bone regeneration in a rat model of composite bone and muscle injury.

Authors:  Nick J Willett; Mon-Tzu A Li; Brent A Uhrig; Joel David Boerckel; Nathaniel Huebsch; Taran L Lundgren; Gordon L Warren; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.056

7.  Role of muscle-derived growth factors in bone formation.

Authors:  M W Hamrick; P L McNeil; S L Patterson
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.041

Review 8.  Bone and muscle: Interactions beyond mechanical.

Authors:  Marco Brotto; Lynda Bonewald
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 9.  Role of IGF-I signaling in muscle bone interactions.

Authors:  Daniel D Bikle; Candice Tahimic; Wenhan Chang; Yongmei Wang; Anastassios Philippou; Elisabeth R Barton
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Establishment of an animal model of a pasteurized bone graft, with a preliminary analysis of muscle coverage or FGF-2 administration to the graft.

Authors:  Tatsuya Yoshida; Akio Sakamoto; Nobuaki Tsukamoto; Koichi Nakayama; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.