Literature DB >> 19281515

Assessment of knowledge and competencies related to implant dentistry in undergraduate and postgraduate university education.

N Mattheos1, C Ucer, T Van de Velde, A Nattestad.   

Abstract

Learning in academic settings is strongly related to the way the students are tested or examined. Assessment therefore must be integrated in the curriculum design, coordinated and should reflect the learning outcomes of the education. Assessment within the field of implant dentistry must fulfil four major objectives: complete and direct the learning process with feedback (formative), ensure that students are adequately prepared (summative), assess attitudes and skills such as critical thinking, reflection and self-assessment ability, and supply continuous feedback to teachers on curricular content and impact. Different assessment methods should be used to assess different levels of competencies throughout the curriculum. Various forms of written or oral assessment methodologies are applicable at earlier stages in the curriculum. At intermediate levels, interactive assessment methods, such as patient simulations (paper based or virtual) and more could encourage the necessary synthesis of several disciplines and aspects of the theoretical knowledge. At higher levels of competence, documentation of clinical proficiency by means of reflective portfolios and diaries is an appropriate assessment method with both formative and summative potential. The highest level of competence requires performance assessment using structured, objective, clinical criteria. The group strongly encourages the use of reflective forms of assessment methods which engage the students in a process of self-appraisal, identification of individual learning needs and self-directed learning. The ultimate goal of this would be to allow the student to develop a lifelong learning attitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19281515     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2008.00546.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ        ISSN: 1396-5883            Impact factor:   2.355


  6 in total

1.  Predoctoral dental implant education at King Abdulaziz University.

Authors:  Hind Ahmed Aljohani; Ali Saad Thafeed Alghamdi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-11-10

2.  Assessing a training programme for primary care dental practitioners in endodontics of moderate complexity: Pilot data on skills enhancement and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  S Eliyas; P F A Briggs; J E Gallagher
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 3.  How does portfolio use affect self-regulated learning in clinical workplace learning: What works, for whom, and in what contexts?

Authors:  Rozemarijn van der Gulden; Angelique Timmerman; Jean W M Muris; Bart P A Thoonen; Sylvia Heeneman; Nynke D Scherpbier-de Haan
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2022-09-22

4.  Acceptance of virtual dental implant planning software in an undergraduate curriculum: a pilot study.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Elefterios Vairaktaris; Anne Bauersachs; Stephan Eitner; Alexander Budach; Christian Knipfer; Florian Stelzle
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Knowledge, aptitudes, and preferences in implant dentistry teaching/training among undergraduate dental students at the University of Barcelona.

Authors:  M-A Sánchez-Garcés; E Berástegui-Jimeno; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-07-01

6.  Relative contribution of haptic technology to assessment and training in implantology.

Authors:  David Joseph; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Pablo Maureira; Cyril Perrenot; Neal Miller; Pierre Bravetti; Pascal Ambrosini; Nguyen Tran
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.