Literature DB >> 19280435

Memory and executive function predict mobility rehabilitation outcome after lower-limb amputation.

Brian F O'Neill1, Jonathan J Evans.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Post-amputation rehabilitation is physically and cognitively demanding. Understanding which specific cognitive domains mediate outcome is critical to the development of interventions.
METHOD: A cohort undergoing post-amputation rehabilitation was assessed before limb fitting and followed up at 6 months (n = 34). The average age was 60.69 years (SD = 13.98). 82.4% of the sample was male. 79.4% had amputations because of peripheral arterial disease. Memory, visuospatial function, executive function, praxis, emotion and language were assessed at Time 1 (first prosthetic clinic attendance). Time 1 data were also gathered on aetiology, level of amputation, comorbidities, pain and demographics. Six month outcomes were the locomotor capability index (LCI), the special interest group in amputee medicine (SIGAM) mobility grades and self reported hours of use.
RESULTS: The LCI at 6 months was significantly predicted in regression analyses by a measure of visual memory (figure recall) (adjusted R2 = 24.8%, df = 32, zbeta = 0.52, p = 0.002. Hours of use were predicted by the verbal fluency test total (adjusted R2 = 17.1%, df= 26, zbeta = 0.45, p = 0.017). SIGAM mobility grades were predicted by a combination of immediate verbal memory (story recall), age, level of amputation and presence of pain (adjusted R2 = 58.2, df = 30, zbeta = 0.52, p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological and clinical variables predict a large amount of 6 month outcome variance. Cognitive difficulties may be considered mediators of poor outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280435     DOI: 10.1080/09638280802509579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  7 in total

1.  Impact of amputation level and comorbidities on functional status of nursing home residents after lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  Todd R Vogel; Gregory F Petroski; Robin L Kruse
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  PREDICTING WALKING ABILITY FOLLOWING LOWER LIMB AMPUTATION: AN UPDATED SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW.

Authors:  Jason T Kahle; M Jason Highsmith; Hans Schaepper; Anton Johannesson; Michael S Orendurff; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Changes in cognitive function from presurgery to 4 months postsurgery in individuals undergoing dysvascular amputation.

Authors:  Rhonda M Williams; Aaron P Turner; Monica Green; Daniel C Norvell; Alison W Henderson; Kevin N Hakimi; Donna J Blake; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Postamputation Cognitive Impairment Is Related to Worse Perceived Physical Function Among Middle-Aged and Older Prosthesis Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Miller; Rashelle M Hoffman; Laura A Swink; Deborah E Barnes; Cory L Christiansen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Association of self-reported cognitive concerns with mobility in people with lower limb loss.

Authors:  Valerie E Kelly; Sara J Morgan; Dagmar Amtmann; Rana Salem; Brian J Hafner
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Effects of prosthetic limb prescription on 3-year mortality among Veterans with lower-limb amputation.

Authors:  Jibby E Kurichi; Pui Kwong; W Bruce Vogel; Dawei Xie; Diane Cowper Ripley; Barbara E Bates
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2015

7.  Bias in amputation research; impact of subjects missed from a prospective study.

Authors:  Lauren V Fortington; Jan H B Geertzen; Joline C Bosmans; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.