| Literature DB >> 19280272 |
Y Matsumoto1, Y Mikuni-Takagaki, Y Kozai, K Miyagawa, K Naruse, H Wakao, R Kawamata, I Kashima, T Sakurai.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Prior 8-week treat<span class="Species">ment with <span class="Chemical">menatetrenone, MK-4, followed by 8-week risedronate prevented the shortcomings of individual drugs and significantly increased the strength of ovariectomized ICR mouse femur compared to the ovariectomized (OVX) controls. Neither MK-4 following risedronate nor the concomitant administration may be recommended because they brought the least beneficial effect.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19280272 PMCID: PMC2765650 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-0888-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Osteoporos Int ISSN: 0937-941X Impact factor: 4.507
Fig. 1Material properties of the femoral mid-diaphysis (top panels) and of the femoral distal epiphysis (bottom panels). After the 16-week treatments with risedronate and/or MK-4, the three-point bending test and compression test were carried out as described in the “Materials and methods” section for the diaphyseal and epiphyseal mechanical strength analyses, respectively. Open and filled bars represent the sham and OVX controls, respectively. The bars of graded shading represent the treatment groups. The data are expressed as the means ± SD and compared using an ANOVA and post hoc Dunnett's multiple comparison test vs. OVX controls. *p < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 2Mineral and geometric properties at 8-week midpoint and 16-week termination. a Bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) in femur diaphysis and metaphysis and (b) cortical thickness, CSMI, and the polar SSI in femur diaphysis. The data are expressed as the means ± SD, and *p < 0.05 represents significance. ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey–Kramer paired multiple comparison test (at 8 weeks) or Dunnett's multiple comparison test vs. OVX controls (at 16 weeks) were used. At 16 weeks, significance (p < 0.05) of each parameter determined by t test against the corresponding 8-week midpoint value was marked by a. The bars are similarly marked to those in Fig. 1
Fig. 3Analysis of femur diaphyseal cortex by confocal laser Raman microspectroscopy. PO43−ν1 at 959 cm−1 was used as a mineral parameter and the amide I at 1,666 cm−1, and hydroxyproline (Hypro) at 855 and 878 cm−1 and proline (Pro) at 919 cm−1 were used as matrix parameters. The spectral band intensity by peak area, height for the Hypro/Pro ratio, or the band width for crystallinity was collected at each band as described in the “Materials and methods” section. The values are compared among 8- and 16-week samples, respectively, and between 8- and 16-week samples as in Fig. 2. Except for the Hypro/Pro ratio, which was based on the Fischer's LSD test, statistical analysis used was the same as in Fig. 2
Three-dimensional structural parameters of epiphyseal trabecular bone at 16 weeks
| BV (mm3) | BS (mm2) | BV/TV (%) | Tb.Th (μm) | Tb.N (/mm) | Tb.Sp (μm) | FD | SMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 0.14 ± 0.05b | 8.0 ± 3.2b | 6.3 ± 2.0b | 35.4 ± 2.0 | 1.8 ± 0.6b | 602 ± 273b | 1.9 ± 0.0 | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| Control | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 5.1 ± 1.6 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 32.0 ± 3.1 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 944 ± 279 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 |
| K to R | 0.22 ± 0.06a | 12.9 ± 2.7a | 8.9 ± 2.4a | 34.2 ± 3.9 | 2.6 ± 0.5a | 369 ± 100a | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| K to WO | 0.15 ± 0.06b | 9.8 ± 3.8b | 6.7 ± 2.6b | 31.0 ± 3.8 | 2.1 ± 0.8b | 536 ± 291b | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| R to K | 0.14 ± 0.03b | 7.8 ± 1.9 | 6.0 ± 1.4 | 33.6 ± 3.5 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 733 ± 376 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.1 |
| R to WO | 0.07 ± 0.03 | 5.6 ± 2.3 | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 26.0 ± 1.8a | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 771 ± 225 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
| R/K to WO | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 6.8 ± 2.7 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | 27.7 ± 2.3b | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 828 ± 397 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 2.8 ± 0.1 |
Data are expressed as means ± SD. Group comparisons were performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test vs. OVX controls
a p < 0.01
b p < 0.05
Fig. 4Representative 3-D images of the distal epiphysis between 1.5 and 2.75 mm proximal to the growth plate after the 16-week treatments. Micro-CT images were reconstructed as described in the “Materials and methods” section
Three-dimensional structural parameters of epiphyseal trabecular bone at 8 weeks
| BV (mm3) | BS (mm2) | BV/TV(%) | Tb.Th (μm) | Tb.N (/mm) | Tb.Sp (μm) | FD | SMI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 0.69 ± 0.15a | 24.7 ± 5.3a | 30.5 ± 5.8b | 54.7 ± 3.2b | 5.5 ± 0.9b | 137.3 ± 75.1a | 2.3 ± 0.0b | 2.7 ± 0.2 |
| OVX control | 0.27 ± 0.05 | 11.8 ± 1.8 | 14.1 ± 4.7 | 45.2 ± 1.3 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 334.7 ± 26.0 | 2.1 ± 0.0 | 2.7 ± 0.2 |
| OVX-K | 0.67 ± 0.05a | 27.3 ± 1.7a | 29.5 ± 1.8a | 48.2 ± 0.9 | 5.8 ± 0.2a | 127.6 ± 24.5a | 2.3 ± 0.0b | 3.1 ± 0.2 |
| OVX-R | 0.56 ± 0.01a | 22.8 ± 1.5a | 22.7 ± 1.8 | 47.7 ± 1.2 | 4.6 ± 0.5 | 190.9 ± 19.1b | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 3.2 ± 0.3b,c |
| OVX-R/K | 0.65 ± 0.06a | 24.3 ± 1.7a | 25.9 ± 1.8b | 50.6 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.2 | 165.7 ± 24.9b | 2.2 ± 0.0 | 3.4 ± 0.3b,c |
Data are expressed as means ± SD. Group comparisons were performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey–Kramer test. No significant difference was detected between OVX groups
a p < 0.01 vs OVX controls
b p < 0.05 vs OVX controls
c p < 0.05 vs sham