Literature DB >> 19280261

Vadose zone microbial biobarriers remove nitrate from percolating groundwater.

William J Hunter1.   

Abstract

Microbial biobarriers are an established technique for cleansing contaminants from aquifers. This study evaluated their use under well-drained conditions within the vadose or unsaturated zone. Three sets of sand filled columns, the positive control, field-capacity, and sub-field-capacity groups, contained biobarriers formed by mixing sand with sawdust and soybean oil. The biobarriers were positioned 1 m from the top of the 145 cm columns. A fourth set of column, the negative control, contained no biobarrier. The positive control group's biobarriers were saturated while biobarriers in the other groups were allowed to drain. At intervals water containing 20 mg l(-1) NO(3-)-N was applied to the columns, the water was allowed to percolate through the columns, and the effluents were collected and analyzed. The biobarriers were highly effective at removing NO(3-). NO(3-)-N in the effluents from the field-capacity, sub-field-capacity, and positive control groups averaged 0.4 +/- 0.1, 0.6 +/- 0.1, and 0.8 +/- 0.1 mg l(-1), respectively, during the final weeks of the study while effluents from the negative control group averaged 17.9 +/- 0.4 mg l(-1). The barriers removed NO(3-) even when the water content was in the 20-40% pore filled space range. During the 12-week study the field-capacity barriers lost 5.6% of their organic content while those in the sub-field-capacity group lost no detectable organic matter indicating that the barriers contained sufficient substrate to last for several years. Vadose zone biobarriers could provide a useful means of protecting surface waters and aquifers from NO(3-).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19280261     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-009-9380-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  9 in total

1.  Five years of nitrate removal, denitrification and carbon dynamics in a denitrification wall.

Authors:  L A Schipper; M Vojvodić-Vuković
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Bioremediation of chlorate or perchlorate contaminated water using permeable barriers containing vegetable oil.

Authors:  William J Hunter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Removal of added nitrate in cotton burr compost, mulch compost, and peat: mechanisms and potential use for groundwater nitrate remediation.

Authors:  Chunming Su; Robert W Puls
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Removing selenite from groundwater with an in situ biobarrier: laboratory studies.

Authors:  William J Hunter; L David Kuykendall
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Use of vegetable oil in a pilot-scale denitrifying barrier.

Authors:  W J Hunter
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.188

6.  Accumulation of nitrite in denitrifying barriers when phosphate is limiting.

Authors:  W J Hunter
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.188

7.  Selection of organic substrates as potential reactive materials for use in a denitrification permeable reactive barrier (PRB).

Authors:  Oriol Gibert; Sylwia Pomierny; Ivan Rowe; Robert M Kalin
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.642

8.  An Azospira oryzae (syn Dechlorosoma suillum) strain that reduces selenate and selenite to elemental red selenium.

Authors:  William J Hunter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Nitrogen transformation in a denitrification layer irrigated with dairy factory effluent.

Authors:  L A Schipper; A McGill
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 11.236

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.