Literature DB >> 1927914

Risk of thrombosis during coronary angioplasty with low osmolality contrast media.

E Esplugas1, A Cequier, F Jara, J Mauri, T Soler, J Sala, X Sabate.   

Abstract

Studies in vitro have suggested that nonionic low osmolar contrast agents produce an increase in thrombogenicity. To determine the incidence of thrombi related to the use of nonionic low osmolar contrast media during coronary angioplasty, a double-blind randomized study was performed in 100 patients. Medication before angioplasty included oral aspirin (250 mg/day) in all cases. At the beginning of the procedure, aspirin (250 mg) and heparin (10,000 U) were intravenously administered. During the procedure patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ionic low osmolar contrast agent ioxaglate (n = 50), or a nonionic low osmolar contrast media iohexol (n = 50). The presence of thrombus was evaluated on the angiogram and on the guidewire immediately after its retrieval from the patients. Clinical, angiographic and procedural variables were similar in the 2 randomized groups. Angiographic evidence of thrombus was observed in 1 patient (2%) assigned to ioxaglate and in 11 patients (22%) assigned to iohexol (p less than 0.005). One patient (2%) from the ioxaglate group and 6 patients (12%) from the iohexol group showed thrombotic residues on the guidewire (p = not significant). Three patients had acute myocardial infarction, 1 patient (2%) receiving ioxaglate and 2 patients (4%) iohexol (p = not significant). There were no deaths. Thus, compared with an ionic low osmolar contrast media ioxaglate, the nonionic low osmolar contrast agent iohexol increases the incidence of thrombus during coronary angioplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1927914     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90489-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Effects of iodinated contrast media on blood and endothelium.

Authors:  Peter Aspelin; Fulvio Stacul; Henrik S Thomsen; Sameh K Morcos; Aart J van der Molen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media.

Authors:  Wendy Bottinor; Pritam Polkampally; Ion Jovin
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Intra-arterial iodinated radiographic contrast material injection administration in a rat middle cerebral artery occlusion and reperfusion model: possible effects on intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Yuko Kurosawa; Aigang Lu; Pooja Khatri; Janice A Carrozzella; Joseph F Clark; Jane Khoury; Thomas A Tomsick
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Unsuccessful pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade during angiocardiography with nonionic contrast material.

Authors:  J Calabuig; S Mejía; J Cabanero; S Crisóstomo; C Navarro; D Martínez Caro
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  An analysis of mechanisms underlying the antifibrinolytic properties of radiographic contrast agents.

Authors:  P M Farrehi; Y Zhu; W P Fay
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 6.  Comparative tolerability of contrast media used for coronary interventions.

Authors:  Enrique Esplugas; Angel Cequier; Joan A Gomez-Hospital; Bruno García Del Blanco; Francisco Jara
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Contrast agent dose and slow/no-reflow in percutaneous coronary interventions : A case-control study of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  S Ding; Y Shi; X Sun; Q Cao; H Dai; J Guan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.443

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.