Literature DB >> 19278754

National point prevalence of Clostridium difficile in US health care facility inpatients, 2008.

William R Jarvis1, JoAnn Schlosser, Ashley A Jarvis, Raymond Y Chinn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent published estimates of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) incidence have been based on small numbers of hospitals or national hospital discharge data. These data suggest that CDI incidence is increasing.
METHODS: We conducted a point prevalence survey of C difficile in inpatients at US health care facilities. The survey was developed, received Institutional Review Board approval, and was then distributed to all Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc (APIC) members. They were asked to complete the survey on 1 day between May 7 and August 29, 2008, reporting the number of inpatients with CDI or colonization and facility-specific information.
RESULTS: Personnel at 648 hospitals completed the survey; this represents approximately 12.5% of all US acute care facilities. All but 3 states and the District of Columbia were represented (mean, 14 facilities per state; range, 2-43). Eighty-two percent reported that their CDI rate had not decreased in the past 3 years. Respondents reported 1443 C difficile-colonized/infected patients among 110,550 inpatients; the overall C difficile prevalence rate was 13.1 per 1000 inpatients (94.4% infection). Detailed data were provided on 1062 (73.6%) patients. Of these, 55.5% were female, 69.2% were >60 years of age, 67.6% had selected comorbid conditions, 79% had received antimicrobials within 30 days, and 94.4% were detected by enzyme immunoassay. The majority of patients (54.4%) were diagnosed < or =48 hours of hospitalization, but 35% had been admitted to a long-term care facility within 30 days, and 47% had been hospitalized within 90 days; 73% met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria for health care-associated CDI. Most facilities (>90%) used contact isolation for CDI patients. Bleach was used for environmental disinfection more commonly during CDI outbreaks than during nonoutbreak periods.
CONCLUSION: Our survey documents a higher C difficile prevalence rate than previous estimates using different methodologies. The majority of inpatient CDI appears to be health care associated. Given that not all patients with diarrhea are tested for CDI and that most facilities use enzyme immunoassays with limited sensitivity to detect C difficile, these are minimum estimates of the US health care facility C difficile burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19278754     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  44 in total

1.  Clinical pearls in infectious diseases.

Authors:  Robert Orenstein; Scott C Litin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Recognition and prevention of hospital-associated enteric infections in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Linda D Bobo; Erik R Dubberke
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Quantifying interhospital patient sharing as a mechanism for infectious disease spread.

Authors:  Susan S Huang; Taliser R Avery; Yeohan Song; Kristen R Elkins; Christopher C Nguyen; Sandra K Nutter; Alaka A Nafday; Curtis J Condon; Michael T Chang; David Chrest; John Boos; Georgiy Bobashev; William Wheaton; Steven A Frank; Richard Platt; Marc Lipsitch; Robin M Bush; Stephen Eubank; Donald S Burke; Bruce Y Lee
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Recent epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Teena Chopra; Pranatharthi Chandrasekar; Hossein Salimnia; Lance K Heilbrun; Daryn Smith; George J Alangaden
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 5.  Surgical Management of Clostridium difficile Colitis.

Authors:  Ann K Seltman
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-12

6.  Comparison of Outcomes Between Total Abdominal and Partial Colectomy for the Management of Severe, Complicated Clostridium Difficile Infection.

Authors:  David Peprah; Alexander S Chiu; Raymond A Jean; Kevin Y Pei
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Fecal microbiota transplant for relapsing Clostridium difficile infection using a frozen inoculum from unrelated donors: a randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Ilan Youngster; Jenny Sauk; Christina Pindar; Robin G Wilson; Jess L Kaplan; Mark B Smith; Eric J Alm; Dirk Gevers; George H Russell; Elizabeth L Hohmann
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 8.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  The intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and Clostridium difficile infection: is there a relationship with inflammatory bowel disease?

Authors:  Justyna Bien; Vindhya Palagani; Przemyslaw Bozko
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.409

Review 10.  Host response to Clostridium difficile infection: Diagnostics and detection.

Authors:  Elena A Usacheva; Jian-P Jin; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Glob Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.