Literature DB >> 19278379

Use of routine interventions in vaginal labor and birth: findings from the Maternity Experiences Survey.

Beverley Chalmers1, Janusz Kaczorowski, Cheryl Levitt, Susie Dzakpasu, Beverley O'Brien, Lily Lee, Madeline Boscoe, David Young.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intervention rates in maternity practices vary considerably across Canadian provinces and territories. The objective of this study was to describe the use of routine interventions and practices in labor and birth as reported by women in the Maternity Experiences Survey of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Rates of interventions and practices are considered in the light of current evidence and both Canadian and international recommendations.
METHODS: A sample of 8,244 estimated eligible women was identified from a randomly selected sample of recently born infants drawn from the May 2006 Canadian Census and stratified primarily by province and territory. Birth mothers living with their infants at the time of interview were invited to participate in a computer-assisted telephone interview conducted by Statistics Canada on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Interviews averaged 45 minutes long and were completed when infants were between 5 and 10 months old (9-14 mo in the territories). Completed responses were obtained from 6,421 women (78%).
RESULTS: Women frequently reported electronic fetal monitoring, a health care practitioner starting or speeding up their labor (or trying to do so), epidural anesthesia, episiotomy, and a supine position for birth. Some women also reported pubic or perineal shaves, enemas, and pushing on the top of their abdomen.
CONCLUSIONS: Several practices and interventions were commonly reported in labor and birth in Canada, although evidence and Canadian and international guidelines recommend against their routine use. Practices not recommended for use at all, such as shaving, were also reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19278379     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  11 in total

Review 1.  Enemas during labour.

Authors:  Ludovic Reveiz; Hernando G Gaitán; Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-22

2.  Outcomes-based health human resource planning for maternal, child and youth health care in Canada: A new horizon for the 21st century.

Authors:  Astrid Guttmann; Eyal Cohen; Charlotte Moore
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Fetal monitoring: creating a culture of safety with informed choice.

Authors:  Lisa Heelan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

4.  Family physician and obstetrician episiotomy rates in low-risk obstetrics in southern Alberta.

Authors:  Andrea Hargrove; Kristy Penner; Tyler Williamson; Sue Ross
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise Farrington; Mairead Connolly; Laura Phung; Alyce N Wilson; Liz Comrie-Thomson; Meghan A Bohren; Caroline S E Homer; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management.

Authors:  Mina Iravani; Mohsen Janghorbani; Elahe Zarean; Masoud Bahrami
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2015 May-Jun

7.  Impact of maternity care policy in Catalonia: a retrospective cross-sectional study of service delivery in public and private hospitals.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet-Peiró; Josefina Goberna-Tricas; Maria J Pueyo-Sanchez; Neus Garriga-Comas; Immaculada Úbeda-Bonet; Carmen Caja-López; Isabel Espiga-López; Vicente Ortún-Rubio
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Evaluating the content and quality of intrapartum care in vaginal births: An example of a state hospital.

Authors:  Zekiye Karaçam; Döndü Arslan Kurnaz; Gizem Güneş
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-03-15

9.  Regional variations in childbirth interventions in the Netherlands: a nationwide explorative study.

Authors:  A E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; D C Zondag; M Nieuwenhuijze; T Van den Akker; C J Verhoeven; C Geerts; F Schellevis; A De Jonge
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Regional variation in obstetrical intervention for hospital birth in the Republic of Ireland, 2005-2009.

Authors:  Jennifer E Lutomski; John J Morrison; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.