Literature DB >> 19277897

Towards self-determination in quality of life research: a dialogic approach.

Leah McClimans1.   

Abstract

Health-related quality of life measures aim to assess patients' subjective experience in order to gauge an increasingly wide variety of health care issues such as patient needs; satisfaction; side effects; quality of care; disease progression and cost effectiveness. Their popularity is undoubtedly due to a larger initiative to provide patient-centered care. The use of patient perspectives to guide health care improvements and spending is rooted in the idea that we must respect patients as self-determining agents. In this paper I look at the two main orientations to quality of life measurement: standardized and individualized measures. I argue that while these measures are attempts to provide for patient self-determination, they both fail to do so. In their place I suggest a new approach which overcomes their respective difficulties: a dialogic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277897     DOI: 10.1007/s11019-009-9195-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Health Care Philos        ISSN: 1386-7423


  7 in total

1.  Benefits of cochlear implantation in early-deafened adults: the Toronto experience.

Authors:  Gerard H Chee; Jennifer E Goldring; David B Shipp; Amy H C Ng; Joseph M Chen; Julian M Nedzelski
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-02

2.  Quality of life--evaluation or description?

Authors:  D Birnbacher
Journal:  Ethical Theory Moral Pract       Date:  1999

3.  Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory.

Authors:  R A Cummins
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2005-10

4.  Conceptual principles of quality of life: an empirical exploration.

Authors:  P Bramston; H Chipuer; G Pretty
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2005-10

5.  Conceptual model of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Carol Estwing Ferrans; Julie Johnson Zerwic; Jo Ellen Wilbur; Janet L Larson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.176

6.  Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users: assessment of outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel M Kaplan; David B Shipp; Joseph M Chen; Amy H C Ng; Julian M Nedzelski
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-08

7.  Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Felicitometric hermeneutics: interpreting quality of life measurements.

Authors:  Charles J Kowalski; Jan L Bernheim; Nancy Adair Birk; Peter Theuns
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-06

2.  Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Leah M McClimans; John Browne
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2011-02

3.  Constructing arguments for the interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures in research: an application of modern validity theory.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Quality of life is a process not an outcome.

Authors:  Leah McClimans; John P Browne
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2012-08

5.  A theoretical framework for patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Leah McClimans
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2010-06

6.  Moral Expertise in the Clinic: Lessons Learned from Medicine and Science.

Authors:  Leah McClimans; Anne Slowther
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Viewing assessments of patient-reported heath status as conversations: Implications for developing and evaluating patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.