Literature DB >> 19277845

Obstetric care provider engagement in a perinatal depression screening program.

J Jo Kim1, Laura M La Porte, Marci G Adams, Trent E J Gordon, Jessica M Kuendig, Richard K Silver.   

Abstract

To investigate obstetric care provider attitudes toward perinatal depression screening and factors associated with variable screening rates. Provider attitudes about depression screening were investigated via structured interviews (open-ended and rating scale questions) and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Most providers (86%) found screening effective at identifying women at risk for perinatal depression (average rating of 8.7 on 10-point analog scale). However, 95% overestimated their own screening rates and 67% inaccurately thought they achieved universal screening. Providers not directly involved in their office-based screening process demonstrated lower average screening rates (37%) than those who maintained active involvement (59%; p = 0.07). Obstetric care providers support perinatal depression screening in the context of a program that assumes responsibility for processing screens, conducts assessments of at-risk women and provides referrals to mental health professionals. Provider participation in screening and tying screening to routine obstetric outpatient activities such as glucose tolerance testing are associated with higher screening rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19277845     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-009-0057-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  12 in total

1.  Technology-assisted nursing for postpartum support: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah E McCarter; Eugene Demidenko; Tauna S Sisco; Mark T Hegel
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  A Systematic Review of Integrated Care Interventions Addressing Perinatal Depression Care in Ambulatory Obstetric Care Settings.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Michael P Flynn; Aimee R Kroll-Desrosiers; Stephanie M Carvalho; Leonard L Levin; Kathleen Biebel; Nancy Byatt
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Predictors of depression screening rates of nurses receiving a personal digital assistant-based reminder to screen.

Authors:  Rebecca Schnall; Leanne M Currie; Haomiao Jia; Rita Marie John; Nam-Ju Lee; Olivia Velez; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  A model for maternal depression.

Authors:  Cynthia D Connelly; Mary J Baker-Ericzen; Andrea L Hazen; John Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Results of a Statewide Survey of Obstetric Clinician Depression Practices.

Authors:  Elke Schipani Bailey; Nancy Byatt; Smita Carroll; Linda Brenckle; Padma Sankaran; Aimee Kroll-Desrosiers; Nicole A Smith; Jeroan Allison; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  Online screening and referral for postpartum depression: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Emily Drake; Erica Howard; Emily Kinsey
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2013-01-03

7.  Patient's views on depression care in obstetric settings: how do they compare to the views of perinatal health care professionals?

Authors:  Nancy Byatt; Kathleen Biebel; Liz Friedman; Gifty Debordes-Jackson; Douglas Ziedonis; Lori Pbert
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.238

8.  Measuring outcomes of digital technology-assisted nursing postpartum: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deborah E McCarter; Eugene Demidenko; Mark T Hegel
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  The Public's views of mental health in pregnant and postpartum women: a population-based study.

Authors:  Dawn E Kingston; Sheila Mcdonald; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Gerri Lasiuk; Suzanne Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Sheila McDonald; Anne Biringer; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sarah McDonald; Rebecca Giallo; Arto Ohinmaa; Gerri Lasiuk; Glenda MacQueen; Wendy Sword; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.