Literature DB >> 19276411

Performance and welfare of laying hens in conventional and enriched cages.

G B Tactacan1, W Guenter, N J Lewis, J C Rodriguez-Lecompte, J D House.   

Abstract

Concerns regarding the welfare of laying hens raised in battery cages have led to the development of enriched cages that allow hens to perform natural behaviors including nesting, roosting, and scratching. This study was conducted to compare indices of production and welfare in birds housed in 2 different caging systems. Shaver White hens were housed from 21 to 61 wk in either conventional battery cages (n = 500; 10 cages; 5 hens/cage; floor space = 561.9 cm(2)/hen) or enriched cages (n = 480; 2 cages; 24 hens/cage; floor space = 642.6 cm(2)/hen) and were replicated 10 times. Enriched cages provided hens with a curtained nesting area, scratch pad, and perches. Production parameters and egg quality measures were recorded throughout the experiment. Plumage condition was evaluated at 37 and 61 wk. Bone quality traits and immunological response parameters were measured at 61 wk, and 59 and 61 wk, respectively. Hen-day egg production, feed consumption, egg weight, and percentage of cumulative mortality of laying hens were not affected by the cage designs. Specific gravity and the percentage of cracked and soft-shelled eggs were also similar between the 2 housing systems. The incidence of dirty eggs was, however, significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in enriched cages than in conventional cages. Feather scores were similar between birds except for the wing region, which was higher (P < 0.05) for hens housed in conventional cages. Bone quality measures tended to be higher for hens housed in enriched cages compared with hens in conventional cages. However, the increase was significant only for bone mineral density. Immunological response parameters did not reveal statistically significant differences. Overall, laying performance, exterior egg quality measures, plumage condition, and immunological response parameters appear to be similar for hens housed in the 2 cage systems tested. Enrichment of laying hen cages resulted in better bone quality, which could have resulted from increased activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276411     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  16 in total

1.  Impact of commercial housing systems and nutrient and energy intake on laying hen performance and egg quality parameters.

Authors:  D M Karcher; D R Jones; Z Abdo; Y Zhao; T A Shepherd; H Xin
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Effects of stock density on the laying performance, blood parameter, corticosterone, litter quality, gas emission and bone mineral density of laying hens in floor pens.

Authors:  H K Kang; S B Park; S H Kim; C H Kim
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Locomotion Induced by Spatial Restriction in Adult Drosophila.

Authors:  Chengfeng Xiao; R Meldrum Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Bone-remodeling transcript levels are independent of perching in end-of-lay white leghorn chickens.

Authors:  Maurice D Dale; Erin M Mortimer; Santharam Kolli; Erik Achramowicz; Glenn Borchert; Steven A Juliano; Scott Halkyard; Nick Seitz; Craig Gatto; Patricia Y Hester; David A Rubin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Technology and Poultry Welfare.

Authors:  Neila Ben Sassi; Xavier Averós; Inma Estevez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Exterior egg quality as affected by enrichment resources layout in furnished laying-hen cages.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Donghua Chen; Fanyu Meng; Yingying Su; Lisha Wang; Runxiang Zhang; Jianhong Li; Jun Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.509

7.  Effects of Different Scratch Mat Designs on Hen Behaviour and Eggs Laid in Enriched Cages.

Authors:  Victoria Sandilands; Laurence Baker; Jo Donbavand; Sarah Brocklehurst
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Comparison of aviary, barn and conventional cage raising of chickens on laying performance and egg quality.

Authors:  M Ahammed; B J Chae; J Lohakare; B Keohavong; M H Lee; S J Lee; D M Kim; J Y Lee; S J Ohh
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.509

9.  Effects of Furnished Cage Type on Behavior and Welfare of Laying Hens.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Donghua Chen; Jianhong Li; Jun Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part I: Performance and well-being.

Authors:  T M Widowski; L J Caston; M E Hunniford; L Cooley; S Torrey
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.