Literature DB >> 19276312

Application of the cloze procedure to evaluate comprehension and demonstrate rewriting of pharmacy educational materials.

Michael J Miller1, Jane E DeWitt, Erin M McCleeary, Kelly J O'Keefe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Written materials are commonly used to communicate pharmacy-relevant information to patients. However, they are often composed at a level that limits comprehension, mitigating a well-intended effect.
OBJECTIVE: To (1) use the cloze procedure (a test designed to assess reading comprehension) to evaluate an individual's understanding of a pharmacy-relevant educational pamphlet; (2) compare results of the cloze procedure with the reading comprehension component of the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA); and (3) use results to demonstrate rewriting of the educational pamphlet.
METHODS: The cloze procedure was applied to a pharmacy-relevant educational pamphlet describing safe medication practices. A total of 162 subjects were recruited from university faculty, staff, and students; a local adult literacy center; and community senior centers. Subjects completed a background interview, the S-TOFHLA, and cloze procedure for the pharmacy-relevant educational pamphlet. S-TOFHLA and cloze procedure scores were described and compared. Cloze procedure responses were used to demonstrate revision of the pamphlet.
RESULTS: Of the 154 subjects analyzed, mean +/- SD age was 56.5 +/- 20.4 years. Subjects were predominantly white (93.5%), female (71.4%), and college graduates (42.2%). Mean score on the S-TOFHLA was 92.1%. A majority (95.5%, 147/154) of subjects demonstrated adequate functional health literacy. In contrast, mean score on the cloze procedure was 53.3%. Internal consistencies of the S-TOFHLA and the cloze procedure were 0.92 and 0.90, respectively. Scores on the cloze procedure and the S-TOFHLA were highly correlated (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). Performance on the cloze procedure indicated that 55.2% of subjects required supplemental teaching.
CONCLUSIONS: In this highly educated, health-literate sample, a majority did not understand the pharmacy-relevant educational pamphlet despite adequate performance on a standard measure of health literacy. The cloze procedure can be used to assess comprehension of educational materials, solicit feedback from intended users, and guide the revision of educational materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276312     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1L642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacists Connect and CARE: Transforming pharmacy customers into patients.

Authors:  Lisa M Guirguis; Sherrill Johnson; Philip Emberley
Journal:  Can Pharm J (Ott)       Date:  2014-05

2.  Establishing content validity for the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument.

Authors:  Heather Gibbs; Karen Chapman-Novakofski
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  ClereMed: Lessons Learned From a Pilot Study of a Mobile Screening Tool to Identify and Support Adults Who Have Difficulty With Medication Labels.

Authors:  Kelly Anne Grindrod; Allison Gates; Lisa Dolovich; Roderick Slavcev; Rob Drimmie; Behzad Aghaei; Calvin Poon; Shamrozé Khan; Susan J Leat
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Development and Validation of an Oral Health Literacy Measurement for Primary School Children in Thailand.

Authors:  Pinpinut Wanichsaithong; Piyada Prasertsom
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-03-07

5.  Assessing and Validating an Educational Resource Package for Health Professionals to Improve Smoking Cessation Care in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Yael Bar-Zeev; Michelle Bovill; Billie Bonevski; Maree Gruppetta; Jennifer Reath; Gillian S Gould
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.