PURPOSE: A high-resolution genomic profiling and comprehensive targeted analysis of INI1/SMARCB1 of a large series of pediatric rhabdoid tumors was done. The aim was to identify regions of copy number change and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) that might pinpoint additional loci involved in the development or progression of rhabdoid tumors and define the spectrum of genomic alterations of INI1 in this malignancy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A multiplatform approach using Illumina single nucleotide polymorphism-based oligonucleotide arrays, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and coding sequence analysis was used to characterize genome-wide copy number changes, LOH, and genomic alterations of INI1/SMARCB1 in a series of pediatric rhabdoid tumors. RESULTS: The biallelic alterations of INI1 that led to inactivation were elucidated in 50 of 51 tumors. INI1 inactivation was shown by a variety of mechanisms, including deletions, mutations, and LOH. The results from the array studies highlighted the complexity of rearrangements of chromosome 22 compared with the low frequency of alterations involving the other chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis suggest that INI1 is the primary tumor suppressor gene involved in the development of rhabdoid tumors with no second locus identified. In addition, we did not identify hotspots for the breakpoints in sporadic tumors with deletions of chromosome 22q11.2. By employing a multimodality approach, the wide spectrum of alterations of INI1 can be identified in the majority of patients, which increases the clinical utility of molecular diagnostic testing.
PURPOSE: A high-resolution genomic profiling and comprehensive targeted analysis of INI1/SMARCB1 of a large series of pediatric rhabdoid tumors was done. The aim was to identify regions of copy number change and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) that might pinpoint additional loci involved in the development or progression of rhabdoid tumors and define the spectrum of genomic alterations of INI1 in this malignancy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A multiplatform approach using Illumina single nucleotide polymorphism-based oligonucleotide arrays, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and coding sequence analysis was used to characterize genome-wide copy number changes, LOH, and genomic alterations of INI1/SMARCB1 in a series of pediatric rhabdoid tumors. RESULTS: The biallelic alterations of INI1 that led to inactivation were elucidated in 50 of 51 tumors. INI1 inactivation was shown by a variety of mechanisms, including deletions, mutations, and LOH. The results from the array studies highlighted the complexity of rearrangements of chromosome 22 compared with the low frequency of alterations involving the other chromosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis suggest that INI1 is the primary tumor suppressor gene involved in the development of rhabdoid tumors with no second locus identified. In addition, we did not identify hotspots for the breakpoints in sporadic tumors with deletions of chromosome 22q11.2. By employing a multimodality approach, the wide spectrum of alterations of INI1 can be identified in the majority of patients, which increases the clinical utility of molecular diagnostic testing.
Authors: Graham R Bignell; Jing Huang; Joel Greshock; Stephen Watt; Adam Butler; Sofie West; Mira Grigorova; Keith W Jones; Wen Wei; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Barbara Weber; Michael H Shapero; Richard Wooster Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Jaclyn A Biegel; Lu Tan; Fan Zhang; Luanne Wainwright; Pierre Russo; Lucy B Rorke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: F Bourdeaut; P Fréneaux; B Thuille; A Lellouch-Tubiana; A Nicolas; J Couturier; G Pierron; C Sainte-Rose; C Bergeron; R Bouvier; X Rialland; V Laurence; J Michon; X Sastre-Garau; O Delattre Journal: J Pathol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Fan Zhang; Lu Tan; Luanne M Wainwright; Marisa S Bartolomei; Jaclyn A Biegel Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Jason X Cheng; Maria Tretiakova; Can Gong; Saptarshi Mandal; Thomas Krausz; Jerome B Taxy Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2008-03-07 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Pasi A Jänne; Cheng Li; Xiaojun Zhao; Luc Girard; Tzu-Hsiu Chen; John Minna; David C Christiani; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-04-08 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Jodi M Carter; Carolyn O'Hara; George Dundas; Dawna Gilchrist; Mark S Collins; Katherine Eaton; Alexander R Judkins; Jaclyn A Biegel; Andrew L Folpe Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Jeffrey C Murray; David J Donahue; Saleem I Malik; Yvette B Dzurik; Emily Z Braly; Margaret J Dougherty; Katherine W Eaton; Jaclyn A Biegel Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-08-21 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Adam W Studebaker; Brian Hutzen; Christopher R Pierson; Terri A Shaffer; Corey Raffel; Eric M Jackson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-04-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Benjamin A Farber; Neerav Shukla; Irene Isabel P Lim; Jennifer M Murphy; Michael P La Quaglia Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Michael C Frühwald; Jaclyn A Biegel; Franck Bourdeaut; Charles W M Roberts; Susan N Chi Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-01-10 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Emilia M Pinto; Dima Hamideh; Armita Bahrami; Brent A Orr; Tong Lin; Stanley Pounds; Gerard P Zambetti; Alberto S Pappo; Amar Gajjar; Sameer Agnihotri; Alberto Broniscer Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Francois Le Loarer; Lei Zhang; Christopher D Fletcher; Agnes Ribeiro; Samuel Singer; Antoine Italiano; Agnes Neuville; Aurélie Houlier; Frederic Chibon; Jean-Michel Coindre; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Hye-Jung E Chun; Emilia L Lim; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Saeed Saberi; Karen L Mungall; Mikhail Bilenky; Annaick Carles; Kane Tse; Inna Shlafman; Kelsey Zhu; Jenny Q Qian; Diana L Palmquist; An He; William Long; Rodrigo Goya; Michelle Ng; Veronique G LeBlanc; Erin Pleasance; Nina Thiessen; Tina Wong; Eric Chuah; Yong-Jun Zhao; Jacquie E Schein; Daniela S Gerhard; Michael D Taylor; Andrew J Mungall; Richard A Moore; Yussanne Ma; Steven J M Jones; Elizabeth J Perlman; Martin Hirst; Marco A Marra Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 31.743