Literature DB >> 19276011

Taking stock of pay-for-performance: a candid assessment from the front lines.

Cheryl L Damberg1, Kristiana Raube, Stephanie S Teleki, Erin Dela Cruz.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been widely adopted, but it remains unclear how providers are responding and whether results are meeting expectations. Physician organizations involved in the California Integrated Healthcare Association's (IHA) P4P program reported having increased physician-level performance feedback and accountability, speeded up information technology adoption, and sharpened their organizational focus and support for improvement in response to P4P; however, after three years of investment, these changes had not translated into breakthrough quality improvements. Continued monitoring is required to determine whether early investments made by physician organizations provide a basis for greater improvements in the future.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19276011     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  15 in total

1.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

2.  Physician Motivation: Listening to What Pay-for-Performance Programs and Quality Improvement Collaboratives Are Telling Us.

Authors:  Kurt R Herzer; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2015-11

Review 3.  Quality indicators and performance measures in diabetes care.

Authors:  David C Aron
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Association between physician quality improvement incentives and ambulatory quality measures.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Alex D Federman; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Examining multiple sources of differential item functioning on the Clinician & Group CAHPS® survey.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Paul K Crane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Health and life insurance as an alternative to malpractice tort law.

Authors:  Walton Sumner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 8.  Lessons from healthcare providers' attitudes toward pay-for-performance: what should purchasers consider in designing and implementing a successful program?

Authors:  Jin Yong Lee; Sang-Il Lee; Min-Woo Jo
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-05-31

9.  The risks of rewards in health care: how pay-for-performance could threaten, or bolster, medical professionalism.

Authors:  Matthew K Wynia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The effect of performance-based financial incentives on improving patient care experiences: a statewide evaluation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; Marc N Elliott; William H Rogers; Dana Gelb Safran
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.