Literature DB >> 19275956

Comparative microscale analysis of the effects of triclosan and triclocarban on the structure and function of river biofilm communities.

J R Lawrence1, B Zhu, G D W Swerhone, J Roy, L I Wassenaar, E Topp, D R Korber.   

Abstract

The broad spectrum antimicrobials triclosan (TCS) and triclocarban (TCC) are commonly detected in the environment. However, there is very limited understanding of the aquatic ecological implications of these agents. During this study, river biofilms were cultivated using 10 microg l(-1) of TCS or TCC and the equivalent in nutrients (carbon, nitrogen) over a developmental period of 8 weeks. Confocal laser microscopy showed that the biofilm communities developing under the influence of TCS and TCC had community architecture and composition different from either control or nutrient exposed communities. Microscale analyses of biofilm community structure indicated a significant reduction in algal biomass (p<0.05) as a result of exposure to either TCS or TCC. Thymidine incorporation did not detect significant differences between control and treated communities. The use of carbon utilization assays based on growth indicated that, in general, TCS and TCC suppressed utilization. The community was altered from one dominated by autotrophic processes to one dominated by heterotrophic processes. Both TCS and TCC treatments resulted in significant (p<0.05) alterations in the composition of the EPS matrix of the communities, suggesting significant changes in community composition. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and PCA-ANOSIM analyses indicated a significant change occurred in the bacterial community as a consequence of TCS treatments. Enumeration of micrometazoa and protozoa revealed an increase in micrometazoan numbers over control values, whereas no clear impact on protozoa was detected in any treatment. This study indicated significant effects of 10 microg l(-1) TCS and TCC on microbial community composition, algal biomass, architecture and activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19275956     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  13 in total

1.  Effects of fullerene (C60), multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and hydroxyl and carboxyl modified single wall carbon nanotubes on riverine microbial communities.

Authors:  J R Lawrence; M J Waiser; G D W Swerhone; J Roy; V Tumber; A Paule; A P Hitchcock; J J Dynes; D R Korber
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparative responses of river biofilms at the community level to common organic solvent and herbicide exposure.

Authors:  A Paule; V Roubeix; G D W Swerhone; J Roy; B Lauga; R Duran; F Delmas; E Paul; J L Rols; J R Lawrence
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Aerobic biofilms grown from Athabasca watershed sediments are inhibited by increasing concentrations of bituminous compounds.

Authors:  Etienne Yergeau; John R Lawrence; Sylvie Sanschagrin; Julie L Roy; George D W Swerhone; Darren R Korber; Charles W Greer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Next-generation sequencing of microbial communities in the Athabasca River and its tributaries in relation to oil sands mining activities.

Authors:  Etienne Yergeau; John R Lawrence; Sylvie Sanschagrin; Marley J Waiser; Darren R Korber; Charles W Greer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Biofilm phosphorus uptake capacity as a tool for the assessment of pollutant effects in river ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorenzo Proia; Anna Romaní; Sergi Sabater
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Uptake and accumulation of antimicrobials, triclocarban and triclosan, by food crops in a hydroponic system.

Authors:  Shiny Mathews; Shannon Henderson; Dawn Reinhold
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Fate of triclocarban in agricultural soils after biosolid applications.

Authors:  Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Impairment of the bacterial biofilm stability by triclosan.

Authors:  Helen V Lubarsky; Sabine U Gerbersdorf; Cédric Hubas; Sebastian Behrens; Francesco Ricciardi; David M Paterson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States.

Authors:  Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and triclocarban on several eukaryotic cell lines: elucidating cytotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and reactive oxygen species generation.

Authors:  Anne Simon; Sibylle X Maletz; Henner Hollert; Andreas Schäffer; Hanna M Maes
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.