Literature DB >> 1927576

Effects of preliminary information in a Go versus No-go task.

J Miller1, R Schäffer, S A Hackley.   

Abstract

A series of studies using a Go versus No-go task examined the question of whether preliminary information available early in the recognition of a stimulus is made available to later processes before stimulus recognition is finished, a question relevant to the controversy between discrete and continuous models. Experiment 1 showed that a Go response is faster following a cue indicating that the response probably would be required than following a cue indicating it probably would not be required. Experiments 2-7 were conducted to find out whether analogous preparation occurred when probability of the Go response was signalled by easily discriminable features of a single stimulus rather than a separate cue. The effect was observed when the easily discriminable features uniquely determined the name of the stimulus letter, but not when they merely indicated that the stimulus name was one of two visually similar letters. These results are consistent with the Asynchronous Discrete Coding model, in which the perceptual system makes available to later processes only preliminary information corresponding to discretely activated stimulus attributes.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1927576     DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(91)90022-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  25 in total

1.  Living in the here and now: interrelationships between impulsivity, mindfulness, and alcohol misuse.

Authors:  Cara Murphy; James Mackillop
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Speed-accuracy modulation in case of conflict: the roles of activation and inhibition.

Authors:  Guido P H Band; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Maurits W van der Molen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-13

3.  Methamphetamine self-administration in humans during D-amphetamine maintenance.

Authors:  Erika Pike; William W Stoops; Lon R Hays; Paul E A Glaser; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.153

4.  Alcohol cues, approach bias, and inhibitory control: applying a dual process model of addiction to alcohol sensitivity.

Authors:  Kimberly A Fleming; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-02-25

5.  Effects of energy drinks mixed with alcohol on behavioral control: risks for college students consuming trendy cocktails.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Mark T Fillmore; Mark E Bardgett; Meagan A Howard
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Impulsivity and alcohol consumption in young social drinkers.

Authors:  Amy L Henges; Cecile A Marczinski
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Tolerance to the impairing effects of alcohol on the inhibition and activation of behavior.

Authors:  Erik W Ostling; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Protracted impairment of impulse control under an acute dose of alcohol: a time-course analysis.

Authors:  Melissa A Miller; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Effect of predictive cuing on response inhibition in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.

Authors:  Jessica W O'Brien; Andria L Norman; Susanna L Fryer; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus; Kenneth Lyons Jones; Edward P Riley; Sarah N Mattson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Alcohol-induced impairment of behavioral control: differential effects on engaging vs. disengaging responses.

Authors:  Cecile A Marczinski; Ben D Abroms; Mark Van Selst; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.