Literature DB >> 19274769

Centriole separation in DNA damage-induced centrosome amplification.

Chiara Saladino1, Emer Bourke, Pauline C Conroy, Ciaran G Morrison.   

Abstract

Altered centrosome numbers are seen in tumor cells in response to DNA damaging treatments and are hypothesised to contribute to cancer development. The mechanism by which the centrosome and chromosome cycles become disconnected after DNA damage is not yet clear. Here, we show that centrosome amplification occurs after ionising radiation (IR) in chicken DT40 cells that lack DNA-PK, Ku70, H2AX, Xpa, and Scc1, demonstrating that these activities are not required for centrosome amplification. We show that inhibition of topoisomerase II induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification, a similar response to that seen after IR. In the immortalised, nontransformed hTERT-RPE1 line, we observed centriole splitting, followed by dose-dependent centrosome amplification, after IR. We found that IR results in the formation of single, not multiple, daughter centrioles during centrosome amplification in U2OS osteosarcoma cells. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutant tumor cells showed high levels of centriole splitting in the absence of any treatment. IR caused pronounced levels of centrosome amplification in BRCA1 mutant breast cancer cells. These data show that centrosome amplification occurs after different forms of DNA damage in chicken cells, in nontransformed human cells and in human tumor cell lines, indicating that this is a general response to DNA damaging treatments. Together, our data suggest that centriole splitting is a key step in potentiation of the centrosome amplification that is a general response to DNA damage. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19274769     DOI: 10.1002/em.20477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  16 in total

1.  Characterization of BRCA1 protein targeting, dynamics, and function at the centrosome: a role for the nuclear export signal, CRM1, and Aurora A kinase.

Authors:  Kirsty M Brodie; Beric R Henderson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Such small hands: the roles of centrins/caltractins in the centriole and in genome maintenance.

Authors:  Tiago J Dantas; Owen M Daly; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Centrosomes in the DNA damage response--the hub outside the centre.

Authors:  Lisa I Mullee; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Chronic Exposure to Particulate Chromate Induces Premature Centrosome Separation and Centriole Disengagement in Human Lung Cells.

Authors:  Julieta Martino; Amie L Holmes; Hong Xie; Sandra S Wise; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Mechanisms of metal-induced centrosome amplification.

Authors:  Amie L Holmes; John Pierce Wise
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.407

Review 6.  Clinically Applicable Inhibitors Impacting Genome Stability.

Authors:  Anu Prakash; Juan F Garcia-Moreno; James A L Brown; Emer Bourke
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-13       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  A centrosome-autonomous signal that involves centriole disengagement permits centrosome duplication in G2 phase after DNA damage.

Authors:  Burcu Inanç; Helen Dodson; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  C-NAP1 and rootletin restrain DNA damage-induced centriole splitting and facilitate ciliogenesis.

Authors:  Pauline C Conroy; Chiara Saladino; Tiago J Dantas; Pierce Lalor; Peter Dockery; Ciaran G Morrison
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability and cancer: mechanistic, clinical and therapeutic issues.

Authors:  Marco Raffaele Cosenza; Alwin Krämer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Unexpected genetic heterogeneity for primary ciliary dyskinesia in the Irish Traveller population.

Authors:  Jillian P Casey; Paul A McGettigan; Fiona Healy; Claire Hogg; Alison Reynolds; Breandan N Kennedy; Sean Ennis; Dubhfeasa Slattery; Sally A Lynch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.