Literature DB >> 19274547

Evaluation of vaginal pessary management: a UK-based survey.

M Gorti1, G Hudelist, A Simons.   

Abstract

The use of intravaginal pessaries has been proven integral in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and urinary incontinence (UI). Although there is no shortage of studies supporting the efficacy of intravaginal devices for conservative management of POP and UI and a large variety of pessaries are widely used in the UK, data on the clinical practice and recommended changing intervals are lacking. To evaluate the current clinical practice and management of patients with vaginal pessaries, self-administered questionnaires were mailed to all UK-based consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists. A total of 640 out of 1,173 (54.6%) clinicians approached returned the questionnaire, out of which 555 (86.7%) used vaginal pessaries. A total of 129 out of 555 (23.3%) clinicians claimed to change their patients pessaries every 3-6 months; 372 (67.0%) every 6 months and 54 (9.7%) reported a frequency of 6-12 months before changing the device. Complication rates of 40.3%, 35.2% and 18.5% were observed by clinicians performing 3-6 monthly, 6-monthly and up to 12-monthly changing intervals. Discontinuation of pessary use was related to recurrent involuntary expulsion in 54.0% (268/496), discomfort (27.4%, 136/49), vaginal bleeding and infection (7.8%, 39/496 clinicians) and dislike of the changing procedure (10.7%, 53/496). Changing intervals greatly vary between clinicians all over the country. The lack of differences in proportions of complications observed in 3-monthly and even up to 12-monthly observation periods suggest that 6-monthly and probably up to 12-monthly intervals represent a safe and cost-effective regimen to follow-up patients with vaginal pessaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19274547     DOI: 10.1080/01443610902719813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  24 in total

1.  Refusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witness women: a survey of current management in obstetric and gynaecological practice in the U.K.

Authors:  Sahana Gupta; Joseph Onwude; Roberto Stasi; Isaac Manyonda
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Elisabeth J Adams; Deepa Gopinath; Fiona Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

3.  Current trends in pessary management of vaginal prolapse: a multidisciplinary survey of UK practice.

Authors:  Claire A Brown; Ashish Pradhan; Ivilina Pandeva
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Natural history of pessary use in women aged 65 - 74 versus 75 years and older with pelvic organ prolapse: a 12-year study.

Authors:  Sophie Ramsay; Le Mai Tu; Cara Tannenbaum
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Is it safe and effective to maintain the vaginal pessary without removing it for 2 consecutive years?

Authors:  Alessio Miceli; Manuel Fernández-Sánchez; Juan Polo-Padillo; José-Luis Dueñas-Díez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Defecatory dysfunction and other clinical variables are predictors of pessary discontinuation.

Authors:  Erin G Dengler; Louisa A Mounsey; Francesca Gines; Manahil Agha; Terri Long; Elizabeth J Geller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  How often should shelf/Gellhorn pessaries be changed? A survey of IUGA urogynaecologists.

Authors:  A Khaja; R M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Effectiveness of a continuous-use ring-shaped vaginal pessary without support for advanced pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  José Luis Dueñas; Alessio Miceli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Cross sectional study on assessment of ring pessary cleaning and removal every six months: adverse events and complications.

Authors:  Suelene Costa de Albuquerque Coelho; Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira; Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito; Cássia Raquel Teatin Juliato
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a multiprofessional survey of practice.

Authors:  Carol Bugge; Suzanne Hagen; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.