Literature DB >> 19273868

How often do physicians address other medical problems while providing prenatal care?

Andrew Coco1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It is unknown to what extent physicians address multiple problems while providing prenatal care. The objective of this study was to determine the percentage of prenatal encounters with 1 or more secondary and tertiary nonobstetric diagnoses and compare rates between family physicians and obstetricians.
METHODS: Using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, 1995-2004, I analyzed prenatal visits to family physicians' and obstetricians' offices. The outcome measure was the percentage of prenatal encounters with 1 or more secondary and tertiary nonobstetric diagnoses seen by family physicians and obstetricians.
RESULTS: There were 6,203 visit records that met study criteria, representing 223 million visits to obstetricians and 21 million visits to family physicians. Of the prenatal encounters with a family physician, 17.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.9%-22.4%) included 1 or more secondary and tertiary nonobstetric diagnoses compared with 7.8% (95% CI, 6.1%-9.6%) of prenatal encounters with an obstetrician (P <.01). After controlling for other variables, being seen by a family physician, compared with being seen by an obstetrician, remained an independent predictor of a prenatal visit with an additional nonobstetric diagnosis (OR = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.82-3.64).
CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians diagnose nonobstetric problems frequently and considerably more often than obstetricians while providing prenatal care. This practice style enhances access to comprehensive primary care for women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19273868      PMCID: PMC2653959          DOI: 10.1370/afm.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  6 in total

1.  Guide to using masked design variables to estimate standard errors in public use files of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  Esther Hing; Sarah Gousen; Iris Shimizu; Catharine Burt
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  Declining trends in the provision of prenatal care visits by family physicians.

Authors:  Donna Cohen; Andrew Coco
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Illuminating the 'black box'. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians.

Authors:  K C Stange; S J Zyzanski; C R Jaén; E J Callahan; R B Kelly; W R Gillanders; J C Shank; J Chao; J H Medalie; W L Miller; B F Crabtree; S A Flocke; V J Gilchrist; D M Langa; M A Goodwin
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Why pregnancy care should be an essential part of family medicine training.

Authors:  Wendy Brooks Barr
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit.

Authors:  S A Flocke; S H Frank; D A Wenger
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study.

Authors:  John W Beasley; Terry H Hankey; Rodney Erickson; Kurt C Stange; Marlon Mundt; Marguerite Elliott; Pamela Wiesen; James Bobula
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  Declining trends in the provision of prenatal care visits by family physicians.

Authors:  Donna Cohen; Andrew Coco
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  Missed opportunities in cardiovascular disease prevention?: low rates of hypertension recognition for women at medicine and obstetrics-gynecology clinics.

Authors:  Julie Schmittdiel; Joe V Selby; Bix Swain; Stacie L Daugherty; Thomas K Leong; Michael Ho; Karen L Margolis; Patrick O'Connor; David J Magid; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Do pregnant women contact their general practitioner? A register-based comparison of healthcare utilisation of pregnant and non-pregnant women in general practice.

Authors:  Esther I Feijen-de Jong; Frank Baarveld; Danielle E M C Jansen; Jennie Ursum; Sijmen A Reijneveld; François G Schellevis
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Impact of prenatal care provider on the use of ancillary health services during pregnancy.

Authors:  Amy Metcalfe; Kristen Grabowska; Carol Weller; Suzanne C Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.