Literature DB >> 19273861

Dynamic changes in paternal X-chromosome activity during imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice.

Catherine Patrat1, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Patricia Diabangouaya, Vivian Vialon, Patricia Le Baccon, Jennifer Chow, Edith Heard.   

Abstract

In mammals, X-chromosome dosage compensation is achieved by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes in females. In mice, X inactivation is initially imprinted, with inactivation of the paternal X (Xp) chromosome occurring during preimplantation development. One theory is that the Xp is preinactivated in female embryos, because of its previous silence during meiosis in the male germ line. The extent to which the Xp is active after fertilization and the exact time of onset of X-linked gene silencing have been the subject of debate. We performed a systematic, single-cell transcriptional analysis to examine the activity of the Xp chromosome for a panel of X-linked genes throughout early preimplantation development in the mouse. Rather than being preinactivated, we found the Xp to be fully active at the time of zygotic gene activation, with silencing beginning from the 4-cell stage onward. X-inactivation patterns were, however, surprisingly diverse between genes. Some loci showed early onset (4-8-cell stage) of X inactivation, and some showed extremely late onset (postblastocyst stage), whereas others were never fully inactivated. Thus, we show that silencing of some X-chromosomal regions occurs outside of the usual time window and that escape from X inactivation can be highly lineage specific. These results reveal that imprinted X inactivation in mice is far less concerted than previously thought and highlight the epigenetic diversity underlying the dosage compensation process during early mammalian development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19273861      PMCID: PMC2653561          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0810683106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  30 in total

Review 1.  Dosage compensation in mammals: fine-tuning the expression of the X chromosome.

Authors:  Edith Heard; Christine M Disteche
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A novel role for Xist RNA in the formation of a repressive nuclear compartment into which genes are recruited when silenced.

Authors:  Julie Chaumeil; Patricia Le Baccon; Anton Wutz; Edith Heard
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Escape from X chromosome inactivation is an intrinsic property of the Jarid1c locus.

Authors:  Nan Li; Laura Carrel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Mutations in ATRX, encoding a SWI/SNF-like protein, cause diverse changes in the pattern of DNA methylation.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; T L McDowell; S Raman; D M O'Rourke; D Garrick; H Ayyub; D R Higgs
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Postmeiotic sex chromatin in the male germline of mice.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Peter J Park; Li-Feng Zhang; James E Shima; John R McCarrey; Michael D Griswold; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  ATRX marks the inactive X chromosome (Xi) in somatic cells and during imprinted X chromosome inactivation in trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Claudia Baumann; Rabindranath De La Fuente
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth.

Authors:  T Tada; Y Obata; M Tada; Y Goto; N Nakatsuji; S Tan; T Kono; N Takagi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Pachytene asynapsis drives meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and leads to substantial postmeiotic repression in spermatids.

Authors:  James M A Turner; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; Peter J I Ellis; Michael J Mitchell; Paul S Burgoyne
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Loss of Atrx affects trophoblast development and the pattern of X-inactivation in extraembryonic tissues.

Authors:  David Garrick; Jackie A Sharpe; Ruth Arkell; Lorraine Dobbie; Andrew J H Smith; William G Wood; Douglas R Higgs; Richard J Gibbons
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Epigenetic dynamics of the Kcnq1 imprinted domain in the early embryo.

Authors:  Annabelle Lewis; Kelly Green; Claire Dawson; Lisa Redrup; Khanh D Huynh; Jeannie T Lee; Myriam Hemberger; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Development       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  81 in total

1.  Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse.

Authors:  Satoshi H Namekawa; Bernhard Payer; Khanh D Huynh; Rudolf Jaenisch; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Nuclear organization and dosage compensation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chow; Edith Heard
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 3.  Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 4.  Epigenesis and plasticity of mouse trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Prudhomme; Céline Morey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse.

Authors:  Luca Giorgetti; Bryan R Lajoie; Ava C Carter; Mikael Attia; Ye Zhan; Jin Xu; Chong Jian Chen; Noam Kaplan; Howard Y Chang; Edith Heard; Job Dekker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Child health, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic programming.

Authors:  Z Hochberg; R Feil; M Constancia; M Fraga; C Junien; J-C Carel; P Boileau; Y Le Bouc; C L Deal; K Lillycrop; R Scharfmann; A Sheppard; M Skinner; M Szyf; R A Waterland; D J Waxman; E Whitelaw; K Ong; K Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 19.871

7.  Difference between random and imprinted X inactivation in common voles.

Authors:  Elena V Dementyeva; Alexander I Shevchenko; Olga V Anopriyenko; Nina A Mazurok; Eugeny A Elisaphenko; Tatyana B Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff; Suren M Zakian
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 8.  Lessons from comparative analysis of X-chromosome inactivation in mammals.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Edith Heard
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Transcription precedes loss of Xist coating and depletion of H3K27me3 during X-chromosome reprogramming in the mouse inner cell mass.

Authors:  Lucy H Williams; Sundeep Kalantry; Joshua Starmer; Terry Magnuson
Journal:  Development       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  The pluripotency factor-bound intron 1 of Xist is dispensable for X chromosome inactivation and reactivation in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Alissa Minkovsky; Tahsin Stefan Barakat; Nadia Sellami; Mark Henry Chin; Nilhan Gunhanlar; Joost Gribnau; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.