OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retinoblastoma regression patterns following chemoreduction and adjuvant therapy. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 557 retinoblastomas. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review following 6 cycles of chemoreduction and tumor consolidation (thermotherapy or cryotherapy). Regression patterns included type 0 (no remnant), type 1 (calcified remnant), type 2 (noncalcified remnant), type 3 (partially calcified remnant), and type 4 (flat scar). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression pattern. RESULTS: Retinoblastoma regressions were type 0 (n = 10), type 1 (n = 75), type 2 (n = 28), type 3 (n = 127), and type 4 (n = 317). Tumors with an initial thickness of 3 mm or less regressed most often to type 4 (92%), those 3 to 8 mm regressed to type 3 (34%) or type 4 (40%), and those thicker than 8 mm regressed to type 1 (40%) or type 3 (49%). Factors predictive of type 1 regression included larger tumor base and closer foveolar proximity. Factors predictive of type 3 included older age, larger tumor base, macular location, closer foveolar proximity, and lack of consolidation. Factors predictive of type 4 included familial hereditary pattern, smaller tumor base, greater foveolar distance, and tumor consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: Following chemoreduction, most small retinoblastomas result in a flat scar, intermediate tumors in a flat or partially calcified remnant, and large tumors in a more completely calcified remnant.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retinoblastoma regression patterns following chemoreduction and adjuvant therapy. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 557 retinoblastomas. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review following 6 cycles of chemoreduction and tumor consolidation (thermotherapy or cryotherapy). Regression patterns included type 0 (no remnant), type 1 (calcified remnant), type 2 (noncalcified remnant), type 3 (partially calcified remnant), and type 4 (flat scar). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Regression pattern. RESULTS:Retinoblastoma regressions were type 0 (n = 10), type 1 (n = 75), type 2 (n = 28), type 3 (n = 127), and type 4 (n = 317). Tumors with an initial thickness of 3 mm or less regressed most often to type 4 (92%), those 3 to 8 mm regressed to type 3 (34%) or type 4 (40%), and those thicker than 8 mm regressed to type 1 (40%) or type 3 (49%). Factors predictive of type 1 regression included larger tumor base and closer foveolar proximity. Factors predictive of type 3 included older age, larger tumor base, macular location, closer foveolar proximity, and lack of consolidation. Factors predictive of type 4 included familial hereditary pattern, smaller tumor base, greater foveolar distance, and tumor consolidation. CONCLUSIONS: Following chemoreduction, most small retinoblastomas result in a flat scar, intermediate tumors in a flat or partially calcified remnant, and large tumors in a more completely calcified remnant.
Authors: Sofia Theodoropoulou; Paraskevi E Kolovou; Yuki Morizane; Maki Kayama; Fotini Nicolaou; Joan W Miller; Evangelos Gragoudas; Bruce R Ksander; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: FASEB J Date: 2010-04-06 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jesse L Berry; Francis L Munier; Brenda L Gallie; Ashley Polski; Sona Shah; Carol L Shields; Dan S Gombos; Kathleen Ruchalski; Christina Stathopoulos; Rachana Shah; Rima Jubran; Jonathan W Kim; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Brian P Marr; Matthew W Wilson; Rachel C Brennan; Guillermo L Chantada; Murali M Chintagumpala; A Linn Murphree Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Selma Sirin; Marc Schlamann; Klaus A Metz; Norbert Bornfeld; Bernd Schweiger; Markus Holdt; Michael M Schuendeln; Simone Lohbeck; Andrej Krasny; Sophia L Goericke Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2013-01-13
Authors: Katarzyna Brodowska; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Anna Marmalidou; Melissa Meyer Zu Horste; Joanna Cichy; Joan W Miller; Evangelos Gragoudas; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Sofia Theodoropoulou; Katarzyna Brodowska; Maki Kayama; Yuki Morizane; Joan W Miller; Evangelos S Gragoudas; Demetrios G Vavvas Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-01-03 Impact factor: 3.240