Literature DB >> 19273480

Yield of claims data and surveys for determining colon cancer screening among health plan members.

Michael Pignone1, Tracy L Scott, Laura A Schild, Carmen Lewis, Raquel Vázquez, Karen Glanz.   

Abstract

Screening can reduce incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer but has been underutilized. Efforts to increase screening depend on accurate data about screening status. We sought to evaluate the independent and combined yield of claims and direct survey for identifying colorectal cancer screening among average-risk health plan beneficiaries. Participants were Aetna members ages between 52 and 80 years from 32 primary care practices in Florida and Georgia participating in the Communicating Health Options through Information and Cancer Education study. Main outcomes were the proportion of average-risk patients who were up-to-date with colorectal cancer screening based on claims data and the estimated additional yield of survey data for patients with no evidence of screening in their claims history. Of 4,020 average-risk members identified, claims data indicated that 1,066 (27%) had recent colorectal cancer screening. Among the 1,269 average-risk members with no evidence of screening by claims data who returned surveys, 498 (39%) reported being up-to-date with screening. Combining claims data and survey data and accounting for survey nonresponse, we estimate that 47% to 59% of member patients were actually up-to-date with screening, an additional yield of 20 to 32 percentage points. We conclude that, among health plan members, the combination of claims data and survey information had substantially higher yield than claims data alone for identifying colorectal cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19273480     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of colorectal cancer test use with medical claims data in a safety-net health system.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Liyue Tong; Paula Anderson; Bonnie Rose; Elizabeth Carter; Mark Koch; Keith Argenbright; Chul Ahn; James Allison; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Effectiveness of a patient and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: the CHOICE trial.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Andrea Winquist; Laura A Schild; Carmen Lewis; Tracy Scott; Jonathan Hawley; Barbara K Rimer; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Dara Stein; Lawrence Joseph; Alain Bitton; Robert J Hilsden; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence Paszat; Jill Tinmouth; Mary Anne Cooper
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  Identifying and collecting pertinent medical records for centralized abstraction in a multi-center randomized clinical trial: the model used by the American College of Radiology arm of the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Ilana F Gareen; JoRean D Sicks; Amanda Adams Jain; Denise Moline; Nancy Coffman-Kadish
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Qualitative Assessment of Washington State Medicaid Health Plan Readiness to Implement Systems-Based Approaches to Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth Witwer; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Allison Cole
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.