Literature DB >> 19272855

Response shift in self-reported functional scores after knee microfracture for full thickness cartilage lesions.

B Balain1, O Ennis, G Kanes, R Singhal, S N J Roberts, Dai Rees, J H Kuiper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether response shift (RS), a change in the internal standards of a patient, occurs in patients treated for full thickness knee cartilage defects. We have also evaluated the effect of functional scores on patient satisfaction after surgery.
DESIGN: Self-administered questionnaires were used to evaluate pre- and post-operative and retrospective post-operative scores of 53 patients following knee microfracture. Patient satisfaction, Lysholm, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and modified International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were evaluated. RS (pre-test-then-test), unadjusted and adjusted treatment effects (UTE and ATE) and their effect sizes were calculated.
RESULTS: All four functional outcome measures had a positive RS. The effect size of the RS ranged from around 0.35 for the Lysholm and IKDC2 score to over 0.9 for the VAS pain score. Gender, age, smoking status and time since follow-up did not significantly affect the RS. RS did not differ significantly between the three patient satisfaction groups (P>0.05). Post-operative Lysholm and IKDC1 scores differed most significantly between the satisfaction groups.
CONCLUSIONS: All four scores had a significant shift, implying that patients thought they felt worse before the operation in retrospect than they did at the time. The traditional way of assessing treatment effect, difference between post-intervention and pre-intervention functional scores, may be confounded by change in the internal standards of the patient and should take this into account. RS did not affect the clinical interpretation in this case series. Patient-reported satisfaction after surgery is only related to post-operative scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19272855     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  10 in total

Review 1.  Scoping review of response shift methods: current reporting practices and recommendations.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Ronak Brahmbatt; Lisa M Lix; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Response Shift After a 4-Week Multimodal Intervention for Chronic Ankle Instability.

Authors:  Cameron J Powden; Matthew C Hoch; Beth E Jamali; Johanna M Hoch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  The effect of smoking on ligament and cartilage surgery in the knee: a systematic review.

Authors:  Praveen Kanneganti; Joshua D Harris; Robert H Brophy; James L Carey; Christian Lattermann; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Only walking matters-assessment following lumbar stenosis decompression.

Authors:  S Budithi; Rohit Dhawan; Andrew Cattell; Birender Balain; David Jaffray
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Response shift effect on gastrointestinal quality of life index after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; King-Teh Lee; Hao-Hsien Lee; Yih-Huei Uen; Chong-Chi Chiu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-10-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  If it's information, it's not "bias": a scoping review and proposed nomenclature for future response-shift research.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Gudrun Rohde; Elijah Biletch; Richard B B Stuart; I-Chan Huang; Joseph Lipscomb; Roland B Stark; Richard L Skolasky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Articular Cartilage Injuries of the Knee: Patient Health Literacy, Expectations for Management, and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Brian J Cole; Michael L Redondo; Eric J Cotter
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Influence of response shift on early patient-reported outcomes following autologous chondrocyte implantation.

Authors:  Jennifer S Howard; Carl G Mattacola; David R Mullineaux; Robert A English; Christian Lattermann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Symptom Chronicity and Tobacco Use: Differences in Athletic and Nonathletic Candidates for Cartilage Surgery.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Sravya Vajapey; James C Kirven; Moneer M Abouljoud; Alex C DiBartola; Brennan Wright; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Anticipated adaptation or scale recalibration?

Authors:  Yvette Edelaar-Peeters; Anne M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.