Literature DB >> 19271886

Effect of target spatial frequency on accommodative response in myopes and emmetropes.

John Taylor1, W Neil Charman, Clare O'Donnell, Hema Radhakrishnan.   

Abstract

This study investigates whether systematic differences exist between the accommodation response/stimulus curves of emmetropes and myopes when the targets are sinusoidal gratings, in particular whether myopic accommodation is relatively less effective when presented with targets of high spatial frequency due to increased tolerance to defocus blur. Ten emmetropes (overall mean sphere +0.19 D, range -0.37 to +1.37 D) and 10 myopes (overall mean sphere -2.89 D, range -1.13 to -6.63 D) viewed Gabor targets with dominant frequencies 1, 4, 8 and 16 c/deg. Maximal grating contrast was 80% and the full, green, stimulus field was 6 deg. Subjects were aged between 18 and 37 years. A further high-contrast 6/30 optotype target was included for comparison purposes. Viewing was monocular, the other eye being occluded. Stimulus demand was varied with trial lenses over the nominal range 0 to 6.0 D and the corresponding accommodation responses were recorded with an open-view, Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 auto-refractor. The resulting accommodation response/stimulus curves were characterized by their slopes over the stimulus range 1.5 to 6.0 D and by an "error index" indicating the extent to which the responses differed from the ideal 1:1 response/stimulus line. No significant differences were found between the mean accommodative behavior of the two refractive groups for any target. There were, however, substantial inter-subject differences. Some subjects in both groups showed more accurate responses with the higher spatial-frequency targets, while others showed optimal response at intermediate frequencies. Although it has been reported in the literature that, in comparison to emmetropes, myopes have reduced sensitivity to blur and response/stimulus curves of lower slope, the present study failed to demonstrate any reduction in their responses to gratings of relatively high spatial frequency. For each target the two refractive groups showed similar accommodative behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271886     DOI: 10.1167/9.1.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  Accommodative stimulus-response curves to low-pass filtered natural images.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Paula Bernal-Molina; Robert Montés-Micó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Peripheral contrast sensitivity and attention in myopia.

Authors:  Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Immature visual neural system in children reflected by contrast sensitivity with adaptive optics correction.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Jiawei Zhou; Haoxin Zhao; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang; Yong Tang; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Retinal Responses to Simulated Optical Blur Using a Novel Dead Leaves ERG Stimulus.

Authors:  Athanasios Panorgias; Stephanie Aigbe; Emily Jeong; Carles Otero; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.799

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.