Literature DB >> 19271877

Object perception: when our brain is impressed but we do not notice it.

Jürgen Kornmeier1, Michael Bach.   

Abstract

Although our eyes receive incomplete and ambiguous information, our perceptual system is usually able to successfully construct a stable representation of the world. In the case of ambiguous figures, however, perception is unstable, spontaneously alternating between equally possible outcomes. The present study compared EEG responses to ambiguous figures and their unambiguous variants. We found that slight figural changes, which turn ambiguous figures into unambiguous ones, lead to a dramatic difference in an ERP ("event-related potential") component at around 400 ms. This result was obtained across two different categories of figures, namely the geometric Necker cube stimulus and the semantic Old/Young Woman face stimulus. Our results fit well into the Bayesian inference concept, which models the evaluation of a perceptual interpretation's reliability for subsequent action planning. This process seems to be unconscious and the late EEG signature may be a correlate of the outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271877     DOI: 10.1167/9.1.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  The advantage of ambiguity? Enhanced neural responses to multi-stable percepts correlate with the degree of perceived instability.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Ambiguous figures - what happens in the brain when perception changes but not the stimulus.

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Michael Bach
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Predicting visual consciousness electrophysiologically from intermittent binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea; Jürgen Kornmeier; Urte Roeber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A different view on the checkerboard? Alterations in early and late visually evoked EEG potentials in Asperger observers.

Authors:  Juergen Kornmeier; Rike Wörner; Andreas Riedel; Michael Bach; Ludger Tebartz van Elst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Auditory event-related potentials associated with perceptual reversals of bistable pitch motion.

Authors:  Gray D Davidson; Michael A Pitts
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Assessing Field Dependence-Independence Cognitive Abilities Through EEG-Based Bistable Perception Processing.

Authors:  Cristina Farmaki; Vangelis Sakkalis; Frank Loesche; Efi A Nisiforou
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  What happens in the brain of meditators when perception changes but not the stimulus?

Authors:  Jürgen Kornmeier; Evelyn Friedel; Lukas Hecker; Stefan Schmidt; Marc Wittmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Large EEG amplitude effects are highly similar across Necker cube, smiley, and abstract stimuli.

Authors:  Ellen Joos; Anne Giersch; Lukas Hecker; Julia Schipp; Sven P Heinrich; Ludger Tebartz van Elst; Jürgen Kornmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The Strasbourg Visual Scale: A Novel Method to Assess Visual Hallucinations.

Authors:  Anne Giersch; Thomas Huard; Sohee Park; Cherise Rosen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Positive and negative hysteresis effects for the perception of geometric and emotional ambiguities.

Authors:  Emanuela Liaci; Andreas Fischer; Harald Atmanspacher; Markus Heinrichs; Ludger Tebartz van Elst; Jürgen Kornmeier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.