Literature DB >> 19271732

Use of ligand based models for protein domains to predict novel molecular targets and applications to triage affinity chromatography data.

Andreas Bender1, Dmitri Mikhailov, Meir Glick, Josef Scheiber, John W Davies, Stephen Cleaver, Stephen Marshall, John A Tallarico, Edmund Harrington, Ivan Cornella-Taracido, Jeremy L Jenkins.   

Abstract

The elucidation of drug targets is important both to optimize desired compound action and to understand drug side-effects. In this study, we created statistical models which link chemical substructures of ligands to protein domains in a probabilistic manner and employ the model to triage the results of affinity chromatography experiments. By annotating targets with their InterPro domains, general rules of ligand-protein domain associations were derived and successfully employed to predict protein targets outside the scope of the training set. This methodology was then tested on a proteomics affinity chromatography data set containing 699 compounds. The domain prediction model correctly detected 31.6% of the experimental targets at a specificity of 46.8%. This is striking since 86% of the predicted targets are not part of them (but share InterPro domains with them), and thus could not have been predicted by conventional target prediction approaches. Target predictions improve drastically when significance (FDR) scores for target pulldowns are employed, emphasizing their importance for eliminating artifacts. Filament proteins (such as actin and tubulin) are detected to be 'frequent hitters' in proteomics experiments and their presence in pulldowns is not supported by the target predictions. On the other hand, membrane-bound receptors such as serotonin and dopamine receptors are noticeably absent in the affinity chromatography sets, although their presence would be expected from the predicted targets of compounds. While this can partly be explained by the experimental setup, we suggest the computational methods employed here as a complementary step of identifying protein targets of small molecules. Affinity chromatography results for gefitinib are discussed in detail and while two out of the three kinases with the highest affinity to gefitinib in biochemical assays are detected by affinity chromatography, also the possible involvement of NSF as a target for modulating cancer progressions via beta-arrestin can be proposed by this method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271732     DOI: 10.1021/pr900107z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  7 in total

Review 1.  Multi-parameter phenotypic profiling: using cellular effects to characterize small-molecule compounds.

Authors:  Yan Feng; Timothy J Mitchison; Andreas Bender; Daniel W Young; John A Tallarico
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Characterizing protein domain associations by Small-molecule ligand binding.

Authors:  Qingliang Li; Tiejun Cheng; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  J Proteome Sci Comput Biol       Date:  2012-12-03

3.  Proteochemometric modelling coupled to in silico target prediction: an integrated approach for the simultaneous prediction of polypharmacology and binding affinity/potency of small molecules.

Authors:  Shardul Paricharak; Isidro Cortés-Ciriano; Adriaan P IJzerman; Thérèse E Malliavin; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.514

4.  Open Source Bayesian Models. 3. Composite Models for Prediction of Binned Responses.

Authors:  Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Sean Ekins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  MOST: most-similar ligand based approach to target prediction.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Hong Mi; Cheng-Yuan Lin; Ling Zhao; Linda L D Zhong; Feng-Bin Liu; Ge Zhang; Ai-Ping Lu; Zhao-Xiang Bian
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-03-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Mapping small molecule binding data to structural domains.

Authors:  Felix A Kruger; Raghd Rostom; John P Overington
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Target prediction utilising negative bioactivity data covering large chemical space.

Authors:  Lewis H Mervin; Avid M Afzal; Georgios Drakakis; Richard Lewis; Ola Engkvist; Andreas Bender
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 5.514

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.