Literature DB >> 19271227

Arthroscopic removal of proud metallic suture anchors after Bankart repair.

Jae-Hoon Jeong1, Sang-Jin Shin.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study presents an arthroscopic removal technique for proud metallic suture anchor after Bankart repair and analyzes the cause of anchor failures. PATIENTS: Six male patients with an average age 23 years who had proud anchor on the glenoid surface were included. The diagnosis of six patients at the time of the primary surgery was traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Four patients had arthroscopic repair and two had open Bankart repair previously. Four patients complained of pain accompanying a metallic clicking sound during shoulder motion which increased with abduction and external rotation. One patient had pain with apprehension of dislocation and another patient suffered from only pain. Most symptoms had been revealed during the rehabilitation period (average 8.3 months) and confused with postoperative pain. The protruded anchors were detected through plain radiographs in four patients and during arthroscopic examination in two patients.
METHOD: To extract the proud anchor arthroscopically, a screw driver of a larger diameter than that of the proud suture anchor was used to retrieve the anchor. A larger screw driver was striked with a hammer along the previous suture anchor hole to make a room between the suture anchor and the adjacent glenoid bone so that the hole of the suture anchor became larger. After the hole was widened, the suture anchor had enough room to move freely and it could be removed with a grasper or a mosquito easily. The location of the proud anchor was 2, 3 and 5 o'clock in three patients and 4 o'clock in three patients. In two patients, the suture anchor was malpositioned about 5 mm medial from the anterior glenoid rim. All patients had chondral damage on the humeral head.
RESULTS: Following the procedure none had shoulder instability in 3 years of follow-up. Preoperative visual analog scale score for pain was an average of 3.5. The visual analog scale score for pain was decreased to 1.2 after surgery. All patients had a slight limitation of external rotation preoperatively, and they showed a normal range of motion postoperatively. Constant score improved from 65 to 89, and similarly, American Shoulder and Elbow Society score increased from 67 to 88 after the operation.
CONCLUSION: Despite small numbers of patients, a successful removal of proud metal suture anchors was achieved using a large empty suture anchor screw driver, which is a simple and reproducible method to remove a proud metallic suture anchor arthroscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271227     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0847-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  9 in total

1.  [Technique and value of arthroscopic implant removal in the shoulder].

Authors:  H Lill; C Katthagen; C Voigt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Comparison between metal and biodegradable suture anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Milano; Andrea Grasso; Domenico A Santagada; Maristella F Saccomanno; Laura Deriu; Carlo Fabbriciani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Complications after arthroscopic labral repair for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Keisuke Matsuki; Hiroyuki Sugaya
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-03

4.  The feasibility and results of an arthroscopic removal of humeral locking plates and glenohumeral arthrolysis after proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Ali Maqdes; Bruno Levy; Shahnaz Klouche; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Stefano Petrillo; Mattia Loppini; Vincenzo Candela; Giacomo Rizzello; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Peri-anchor cyst formation after arthroscopic bankart repair: comparison between biocomposite suture anchor and all-suture anchor.

Authors:  Seokhwan Jin; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-11-27

7.  A non-inferiority comparison of Delta Medical's PEEK Suture Anchor and Smith & Nephew's PEEK Suture Anchor in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Hongtao Wang; Yongsheng Xu; Yanlin Li; Guofeng Cai; Yufeng Wu; Ziqi Huang; Qiang Li; Jing Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

8.  Arthroscopic Removal of a Displaced Cannulated Screw after Glenoid Rim Fracture - A Case Report.

Authors:  Elias T Berning; Thilo Sydow
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

9.  EVALUATION OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SHOULDER INSTABILITY.

Authors:  Roberto Yukio Ikemoto; Joel Murachovsky; Luis Gustavo Prata Nascimento; Rogerio Serpone Bueno; Luiz Henrique Oliveira Almeida; Claudio Kojima
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.