OBJECTIVE: This article describes the application of quality improvement methodology to implement a measurement tool for the assessment of functional status in pediatric patients with chronic pain referred for behavioral intervention. METHODS: The Functional Disability Inventory (FDI), a validated instrument for assessment of pain-related disability, was chosen as the primary clinical outcome measure. Using improvement science methodology, PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles were run to evaluate: (a) regular FDI administration, (b) two administration methods, (c) regular patient feedback, and (d) documentation methods. RESULTS: Within 1 month, psychologists were administering the FDI at least 80% of the time to patients. A high level of reliability using two administration methods (92.8%) was demonstrated. The FDI was feasible to integrate into clinical practice. Modifications to electronic records further enhanced clinician reliability of documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement methods are an innovative way to make process changes in pediatric psychology settings to dependably gather and document evidence-based patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the application of quality improvement methodology to implement a measurement tool for the assessment of functional status in pediatric patients with chronic pain referred for behavioral intervention. METHODS: The Functional Disability Inventory (FDI), a validated instrument for assessment of pain-related disability, was chosen as the primary clinical outcome measure. Using improvement science methodology, PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycles were run to evaluate: (a) regular FDI administration, (b) two administration methods, (c) regular patient feedback, and (d) documentation methods. RESULTS: Within 1 month, psychologists were administering the FDI at least 80% of the time to patients. A high level of reliability using two administration methods (92.8%) was demonstrated. The FDI was feasible to integrate into clinical practice. Modifications to electronic records further enhanced clinician reliability of documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Quality improvement methods are an innovative way to make process changes in pediatric psychology settings to dependably gather and document evidence-based patient outcomes.
Authors: Rita Mangione-Smith; Alison H DeCristofaro; Claude M Setodji; Joan Keesey; David J Klein; John L Adams; Mark A Schuster; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pamela J Degotardi; Emily S Klass; Batya S Rosenberg; Diana G Fox; Kim A Gallelli; Beth S Gottlieb Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2005-08-24
Authors: Patrick J McGrath; Gary A Walco; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin; Mark T Brown; Karina Davidson; Christopher Eccleston; G Allen Finley; Kenneth Goldschneider; Lynne Haverkos; Sharon H Hertz; Gustaf Ljungman; Tonya Palermo; Bob A Rappaport; Thomas Rhodes; Neil Schechter; Jane Scott; Navil Sethna; Ola K Svensson; Jennifer Stinson; Carl L von Baeyer; Lynn Walker; Steven Weisman; Richard E White; Anne Zajicek; Lonnie Zeltzer Journal: J Pain Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Susmita Kashikar-Zuck; Stacy R Flowers; Robyn Lewis Claar; Jessica W Guite; Deirdre E Logan; Anne M Lynch-Jordan; Tonya M Palermo; Anna C Wilson Journal: Pain Date: 2011-03-31 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Margareth Crisóstomo Portela; Peter J Pronovost; Thomas Woodcock; Pam Carter; Mary Dixon-Woods Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 7.035