Literature DB >> 19269070

Professional doctorate supervision: exploring student and supervisor experiences.

Nancy-Jane Lee1.   

Abstract

This paper discusses research supervision within one professional doctorate programme; focusing on the processes and issues students and supervisors gave priority. An exploratory, descriptive approach was used to develop a pilot study. Data was collected from three sources. First student perceptions and experiences of supervision were obtained during a group workshop. Observations and field notes were gathered during this event. A second, similar event was undertaken with professional doctorate research supervisors. Finally a convenience sample of students and supervisors (two of each) participated in open ended one to one discussions regarding supervision. The discussions were tape recorded, transcribed and analysed, along with the workshop field notes and observations. There are implied differences between professional doctorates and the PhD relating to process, purpose and outcome [Yam, B., 2005. Professional doctorate and nursing practice. Nurse Education Today 25 (7), 564-572; Laing, S., 2000. Linking research to practice. Physiotherapy 86 (7), 371]. Given such implications professional doctorate research supervision could, or should, embrace critical engagement with issues related to the leadership of research in professional practice; moving beyond research and methodological issues. Indeed it had been presupposed such issues would emerge in this study. For example it had been anticipated that students would want a supervisor or adviser from within their practice setting, to provide insight and support in relation to leading research in practice and to complement the role of their research supervisor. Such complementary supervisory roles within the practice context are given credence in the literature [Kemp, S., 2004. Professional doctorates and doctoral education. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour 7 (4), 401-410]. However students preferred to utilise support networks within the professional doctorate itself to address professional issues.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19269070     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  3 in total

1.  The experience of international nursing students studying for a PhD in the U.K: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Catrin Evans; Keith Stevenson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2011-06-13

2.  Postgraduate Nursing Students' Expectations of their Supervisors in Iran: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hajihosseini; Mansoureh Zagheri Tafreshi; Meimanat Hosseini; Ahmad Reza Baghestani
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

3.  Teachers' and postgraduate nursing students' experience of the educational environment in Iran: A qualitative Research.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hajihosseini; Mansoureh Zagheri Tafreshi; Meimanat Hosseini; Ahmad Reza Baghestani
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2017-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.