Literature DB >> 19268766

Intracranial hemorrhage after carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in the United States in 2005.

Carlos H Timaran1, Frank J Veith, Eric B Rosero, J Gregory Modrall, R James Valentine, G Patrick Clagett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The effect of more intense dual antiplatelet therapy required for CAS on the frequency of ICH has not been established. This study was undertaken to evaluate the nationwide occurrence of ICH associated with CAS vs CEA.
METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients discharged after CAS and CEA during 2005. The type of revascularization and major adverse events, ie, in-hospital ICH, postprocedural stroke, and death rates, were determined by cross-tabulating specific procedural codes for CAS and CEA and diagnostic codes for carotid stenosis. Risk stratification was performed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between type of revascularization, comorbidities, ICH, and risk-adjusted mortality.
RESULTS: In 2005, the estimated number of carotid revascularizations was 135,903. The vast majority of patients underwent CEA (90.4%), whereas CAS was performed in 13,093 (9.6%) patients. Most patients (92.2%) underwent treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. CAS patients had higher postoperative stroke rates (2.1% vs 1.1%; P < .001) and in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 0.6%; P < .001) than CEA patients. ICH occurred in 19 patients (0.15%) after CAS and in 20 patients (0.016%) after CEA (P < .001). CAS was identified as an independent predictor for postoperative stroke (odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.0; P < .001), in-hospital mortality (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8; P < .001) and ICH (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 3.1-11.1; P < .001) after adjusting for age, gender, symptomatic status, comorbidities, admission, and hospital type using logistic regression. In-hospital mortality was 12.5% among patients developing ICH (OR, 23.2; 95% CI, 9.1-54.4; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In the United States, patients undergoing CAS have not only significantly increased postoperative stroke and death rates compared with those undergoing CEA, but also a sixfold increased risk of ICH. Although ICH after CAS is extremely rare, its devastating nature and high mortality warrant further investigation to define specific risk factors, prevention, and treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19268766     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.09.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  11 in total

1.  The neurointerventional bubble.

Authors:  H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Unprotected carotid artery stenting in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis: results and long-term follow-up in a single-center experience.

Authors:  R Oteros; E Jimenez-Gomez; F Bravo-Rodriguez; J J Ochoa; R Guerrero; F Delgado
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Primary Angioplasty Versus Stenting for Endovascular Management of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease Following Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Mark R Villwock; David J Padalino; Raghu Ramaswamy; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-06

Review 4.  Management of De Novo Carotid Stenosis and Postintervention Restenosis-Carotid Endarterectomy Versus Carotid Artery Stenting-a Review of Literature.

Authors:  Runqi Wangqin; Paul R Krafft; Keaton Piper; Jay Kumar; Kaya Xu; Maxim Mokin; Zeguang Ren
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 6.829

5.  In-hospital outcomes alone underestimate rates of 30-day major adverse events after carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Patric Liang; Yoel Solomon; Nicholas J Swerdlow; Chun Li; Rens R B Varkevisser; Livia E V M de Guerre; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Evaluation of four risk-scoring methods to predict long-term outcomes in patients undergoing aorto-bifemoral bypass for aorto-iliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  Francisca García; Joaquín Marchena; Vicente Cabrera; María Hermida; Enrico Sotgiu
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2012-03

7.  Carotid Artery Stenosis with Acute Ischemic Stroke: Stenting versus Angioplasty.

Authors:  Mark R Villwock; David J Padalino; Eric M Deshaies
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-10

8.  Effectiveness and safety of omega-3 fatty acids for the prevention of ischemic complications following carotid artery stenting: An early terminated pilot study.

Authors:  Farzaneh Foroughinia; Elaheh Jamshidi; Haniyeh Javanmardi; Anahid Safari; Afshin Borhani-Haghighi
Journal:  Iran J Neurol       Date:  2018-01-05

9.  Comparing Long-term Mortality After Carotid Endarterectomy vs Carotid Stenting Using a Novel Instrumental Variable Method for Risk Adjustment in Observational Time-to-Event Data.

Authors:  Jesse A Columbo; Pablo Martinez-Camblor; Todd A MacKenzie; Douglas O Staiger; Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; A James O'Malley
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-09-07

10.  Perioperative Blood Pressure Control in Carotid Artery Stenosis Patients With Carotid Angioplasty Stenting: A Retrospective Analysis of 173 Cases.

Authors:  Longlong Zheng; Jiang Li; Haixiao Liu; Hao Guo; Lei Zhao; Hao Bai; Zhongjun Yan; Yan Qu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.