Literature DB >> 19268733

Effect of culprit-lesion remodeling versus plaque rupture on three-year outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Hiroyuki Okura1, Yoshio Kobayashi, Satoru Sumitsuji, Mitsuyasu Terashima, Toru Kataoka, Motomaru Masutani, Mitsumasa Ohyanagi, Kenei Shimada, Haruyuki Taguchi, Yuji Yasuga, Yoshihiro Takeda, Yoshitaka Ohashi, Kojiro Awano, Kenichi Fujii, Gary S Mintz.   

Abstract

To investigate intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome, 94 patients with a first acute coronary syndrome with both preintervention intravascular ultrasound imaging and long-term follow-up were enrolled in this study. Remodeling index was defined as external elastic membrane cross-sectional area at the target lesion divided by that at the proximal reference. Arterial remodeling was defined as either positive (PR: remodeling index >1.05) or intermediate/negative remodeling (remodeling index < or =1.05). Clinical events were death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization. Patients were followed up for a mean of 3 years. PR was observed in 50 (53%), and intermediate/negative remodeling, in 44 (47%). During the 3-year follow-up, there were 20 target-lesion revascularization events and 5 deaths (2 cardiac and 3 noncardiac), but no myocardial infarctions. Patients with PR showed significantly lower major adverse cardiac event (MACE; death, myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization)-free survival (log-rank p = 0.03). However, patients with plaque rupture showed a nonsignificant trend toward lower MACE-free survival (p = 0.13), but there were no significant differences in MACE-free survival between those with single versus multiple plaque ruptures. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, only culprit lesion PR was an independent predictor of MACEs (p = 0.04). In conclusion, culprit-lesion remodeling rather than the presence or absence of culprit-lesion plaque rupture was a strong predictor of long-term (3-year) clinical outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19268733     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.11.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Natural history of experimental coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling in relation to endothelial shear stress: a serial, in vivo intravascular ultrasound study.

Authors:  Konstantinos C Koskinas; Charles L Feldman; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Ahmet U Coskun; Michael Jonas; Charles Maynard; Aaron B Baker; Michail I Papafaklis; Elazer R Edelman; Peter H Stone
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  What have we learned about plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes?

Authors:  So-Yeon Choi; Gary S Mintz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  TGFB1 genetic polymorphisms and coronary heart disease risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingchang Lu; Jolanda M A Boer; Roza M Barsova; Olga Favorova; Anuj Goel; Michael Müller; Edith J M Feskens
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 4.  Clinical expert consensus document on intravascular ultrasound from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (2021).

Authors:  Yuichi Saito; Yoshio Kobayashi; Kenichi Fujii; Shinjo Sonoda; Kenichi Tsujita; Kiyoshi Hibi; Yoshihiro Morino; Hiroyuki Okura; Yuji Ikari; Junko Honye
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-11-12

5.  Highly efficient nonrigid motion-corrected 3D whole-heart coronary vessel wall imaging.

Authors:  Gastão Cruz; David Atkinson; Markus Henningsson; Rene M Botnar; Claudia Prieto
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.